Human testing lawsuit dismissed; Court lacks jurisdiction to hear case against EPA
So the EPA and its researchers are free to violate all the rules of human experimentation — and no one can do anything about it.
Search Results for: human experiments
NBC-17 Video Report: Alleged conflicts of interest in controversial EPA experiments
The local NBC affiliate in Raleigh, NC takes a look at the North Carolin Medical Board’s decision to ignore the conduct of physicians involved in EPA’s illegal human experiments.
North Carolina Medical Board rife with conflicts of interest in EPA human testing controversy
Since the North Carolina Medical Board failed to provide us with any rational whatsoever for its closing its investigation of the EPA human testing docs, we must ask why.
North Carolina Medical Board refuses to discipline EPA human testing docs
Apparently committing illegal human experiments, lying to study subjects about the risks, and committing assault and battery against study subjects do not violate the North Carolina Medical Practice Act.
Judge hears jurisdictional argument in ATI v. EPA (human testing lawsuit)
Federal Judge Anthony Trenga listened to about one hour of argument today in American Tradition Institute v. EPA, our lawsuit to end ongoing illegal scientific experiments involving human beings conducted by the EPA. At the conclusion of argument, Judge Trenga took the case on advisement. Stay tuned for his decision on the jurisdictional matters in … Continue reading Judge hears jurisdictional argument in ATI v. EPA (human testing lawsuit)
Shock: EPA exposes human guinea pigs to lead; Agency ignores own 'no safe' exposure determination
The EPA has exposed human test subjects to lead despite the agency’s conclusion that there is “no safe” level of exposure to the heavy metal.
EPA Charged With Lethal Experiments On Hundreds Of Unsuspecting Subjects
Larry Bell writes about EPA’s illegal human experiments at Forbes.com.
House Committee requests investigation into illegal EPA human testing
“In a letter sent yesterday to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG), Investigations and Oversight Chairman Paul Broun (R-GA) requested that the Inspector General (IG) review EPA’s human research studies involving concentrated airborne particles.” [House Media Release | Letter to EPA IG]
Is Duke's Green Dean Okay with Duke Prof's Involvement in Illegal EPA Human Testing?
Duke University’s dean of green says particulate matter kills — so why does he give a pass to a Duke physician exposing elderly asthmatics to high concentrations of such pollutants?
EPA invokes Fifth Amendment with media in human testing scandal?
While EPA seems to be trying to invoke a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, Politico is trying to fill the agency’s deafening silence.
EPA comments on human testing lawsuit; Claims UNC is 'independent'; Records show otherwise
In response to yesterday’s Washington Times report by Kerry Picket (“Lawsuit filed against EPA over pollution experiments on humans“), the EPA e-mailed Picket:
EPA vs. The Rules for Protection Human Study Subjects
So let’s compare conduct of EPA and the University of North Carolina with the rules for protecting human subjects that have been set since World War II. EPA/UNC vs. the Nuremberg Code Voluntary and Informed Consent. At no time did EPA inform any study subject about how toxic (i.e., death within hours after any exposure, … Continue reading EPA vs. The Rules for Protection Human Study Subjects