JunkScience.com requests JAMA retract new Harvard PM2.5 study on basis of scientific misconduct
A moment of truth for JAMA.
Search Results for: pm2.5
Harvard’s perpetual PM2.5 junk science machine strikes again
The same crew that published the scientific misconduct-fueled PM2.5 study in the New England Journal of Medicine last summer has now published a new scientific misconduct-fueled study based on the same Medicare data in the Journal of the American Medical Association. You can tell that JunkScience.com forced the authors to be somewhat more candid in … Continue reading Harvard’s perpetual PM2.5 junk science machine strikes again
Nope, PM2.5 from forest fires doesn’t kill anyone, either
Lazy or lyin’ researchers and the WaPo’s Chris Mooney get it wrong (again).
JunkScience.com Challenge: This PM2.5 study is junk. Disagree? Debunk me!
Hey, Dr. Helen Suh of Tufts University — or anyone else. Shut me up. I’m askin’ for it. Just be specific.
NEJM editor Drazen gets $468,000 government grant while attacking Trump with bogus PM2.5 study
Wonder how many researchers can get away with publicly attacking the President and get a federal grant at the same time?
Latest air quality scam: PM2.5 cause heart attacks by blood type
From Brigham Young University epidemiology fraudster C. Arden ‘Blue-Sky-Air-Is-More-Dangerous-Than-Smoking’ Pope, III.
Claim: PM2.5 killed 1.22 million Chinese in 2013 — So where are the bodies?
Chinese air quality is bad, but made-up statistics touting imaginary deaths don’t fly. Surely with so many deaths, someone can find one death linked with PM2.5?
JunkScience forces Fake News to retract attack on California PM2.5 study
Our California study is the best-conducted PM2.5-mortality in existence. It debunks $600 million worth of EPA funded science fraud. Yesterday, the Fake News Media tried to smear it. I fixed that.
Lyin’ Washington Post: Pretends EPA change on PM2.5 is arbitrary
Meet the Washington Post’s expert on PM2.5… New Republic writer Emily Atkin.
JunkScience.com PM2.5 efforts pay off: Form economic basis for repealing the Obama EPA Clean Power Plan
You’re welcome. Read my book for how we did it.
Winning!!! Clean Power Plan proposes JunkScience.com view that PM2.5 kills no one
Since July 2011, JunkScience.com has championed the view that PM2.5 in outdoor kills no one. Now that view has been adopted in the new EPA proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan.
Oh boy! Another new paper debunks EPA’s claim that reducing PM2.5 levels saves lives
EPA has claimed that reducing PM2.5 concentrations can save 570,000 lives in the U.S. every year (i.e., prevent one-quarter of all deaths annually).