Negative studies and PM2.5
Courtesy of Stan Young, below is a (growing) list of published papers that report no association between PM2.5 and mortality.
Search Results for: pm2.5
Pope fails to find error in Enstrom’s 2017 reanalysis of Pope 1995 PM2.5 study
Arden Pope had 14 months to find an error in Jim Enstrom’s 2017 redo and takedown of Pope’s 1995 study. Despite Pope’s arm-waving no actual error was found. Here is the paragraph of Enstrom’s response: Read Enstrom’s entire response published in Dose-Response. Background/Additional Reading New study debunks key EPA PM2.5 study Dunn in Dose-Response: Enstrom’s … Continue reading Pope fails to find error in Enstrom’s 2017 reanalysis of Pope 1995 PM2.5 study
Winning: Harvard’s Joel Schwartz Drops Laughable Claim That PM2.5 Epidemiological Correlations are ‘Strong’
The letters are finally published for last December’s junk science-powered PM2.5 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. We made huge progress.
New Study: Still no association between PM2.5, ozone and premature death
This is a new PM2/5/ozone analysis from Stan Young et al. It uses a different methodology from last year’s California study on the same California data. Same answer, though. And the data is available from the study authors — something the EPA-funded air pollution mafia refuses to share.
NO… blacks not a higher risk from PM2.5 than whites…. NO
PM2.5 doesn’t kill people — white, black or purple. But it does make researchers of all skin colors dishonest.
JAMA summarily rejects Enstrom manuscript spotlighting errors in 2002 Pope PM2.5 study
JAMA editor-in-chief Howard Bauchner doesn’t want anyone to burst his PM2.5 science fraud bubble.
JAMA editor reneges on commitment to review Harvard PM2.5 study for misconduct
Dr. Howard Bauchner, you lied to me. No worries. though. You just confirmed that I am correct about PM2.5 and that the EPA-Harvard-NEJM-JAMA PM2.5 cabal is engaged in major science fraud.
Dr. John Dunn blasts JAMA over Harvard PM2.5 fraud
And the DHHS Office of Research Integrity gets a referral as well. Read Dunn’s letters to JAMA and ORI.
Resistance Exposed: EPA scientist too busy ‘fighting’ EPA budget cuts to review NEJM PM2.5 paper
Should EPA employees really be employed to “fight” budget cuts ordered by the President?
Pope admits no physical evidence supports claim that PM2.5 causes death
Here is Arden Pope’s response to Jim Enstrom’s March 2017 study in Dose Response. Past Pope’s lengthy arm-waving about dubious-if-not-fraudulent statistics, in the end he cannot cite a single bit of physical evidence that PM2.5 kills anyone — even though he claims 4.2 million people were killed by PM2.5 in 2015. Here’s the key passage: … Continue reading Pope admits no physical evidence supports claim that PM2.5 causes death
American Cancer Society basically confirms Jim Enstrom destroyed original 1995 Pope PM2.5 study
The worst the American Cancer Society can say about Jim Enstrom’s total debunking and destruction of Arden Pope’s 1995 PM2.5 analysis (one of the two main lines relied upon by EPA in its war on coal rules) is “we have no knowledge of how nor from what source he obtained the data used in the … Continue reading American Cancer Society basically confirms Jim Enstrom destroyed original 1995 Pope PM2.5 study
Stan Young letter Enstrom redo of Pope PM2.5 study
Jim Enstrom recently redid Arden Pope’s 1995 secret science paper claiming that PM2.5 killed. Enstrom reported no association between PM2.5 and death. Below is Stan Young’s letter on Enstrom’s re-analysis of Pope.