Meet the Washington Post’s expert on PM2.5… New Republic writer Emily Atkin.
The Lyin’ WaPo goes out of its way to ignore the work of Steve Milloy/Stan Young/Jim Enstrom/Congress on PM2.5 in order to make the proposed repeal of the Clean Power Plan look arbitrary. First, read how our work forms the economic basis for the repeal of the CPP.
The relevant excerpts from the Lyin’ WaPo article are below. Note they pretend there is only one side of the PM2.5 story.
The Lyin’ WaPo is lying by omission.
- My book “Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA” is the comprehensive takedown of the PM2.5 scare.
- Looking at all deaths in California between 2000-2012, Stan Young’s study shows there is no statistical relationship between PM2.5 and death.
- Jim Enstrom’s 2017 redo of Arden Pope’s infamous PM2.5 line of studies exposes that fraud.
- The House passed the HONEST Act (formerly known as the EPA Secret Science Reform Act) because of PM2.5 science fraud.
Note the Lyin’ WaPo article also relies on: