EPA CO2 rules will make make people poorer — and then kill them
Statistician Stan Young shows how the real costs and imaginary benefits of the EPA CO2 rule are a deadly combination.
Statistician Stan Young shows how the real costs and imaginary benefits of the EPA CO2 rule are a deadly combination.
US EPA uses the fruit and nut California situation to push radical enviro agendas. Paul Driessen explains.
Here is the story of Jim Enstrom, whose case has been my case for many years now.
There is no carcinogenic or toxic effect of second-hand smoke.
Josh Bloom commented that he did not contribute to the ACSH posting on second hand smoke.
I can’t believe the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) sometimes.
Charles Battig MD is a distinguished anesthesiologist and electrical engineer.
Steve Milloy is a regular contributor to the public education and political advocacy work of the California Construction Trucking Association.
It’s dry and dusty and the flakes of California with their matching t shirts are protesting.
Here’s why House Science Committee Ranking Member Eddie Bernice Johnson opposes the Committee’s recent vote to subpoena EPA’s secret science.
“By all appearances UCLA did, in fact, violate [JunkScience.com friend] Jim Enstrom’s first amendment rights, not to mention his 14th amendment rights, and purposely deprived him of the funding he needed just to shut him up on issues of air pollution.”
TUCSON, Ariz., Dec. 11, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — According to an article in the winter 2012 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, research sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violates “every law, regulation, and standard developed since World War II for the protection of human subjects.”