Hard to believe a study was needed.
Hard to believe a study was needed.
No surprise in these results.
Fewer substances will obviously cause fewer effects. That said, keep in mind that mere exposure does not equal toxicity. Even with tobacco smoking, it’s the dose that makes the poison.
The media release is below.
New study compares the effects of direct exposure to cigarette smoke or e-cigarette vapor
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC./GENETIC ENGINEERING NEWS
New Rochelle, NY, February 1, 2017–Researchers reported changes in the expression levels of 123 genes when reconstituted lung tissue was exposed to cigarette smoke, compared to only two genes that could be confirmed following exposure to e-cigarette aerosols. They also reported increased levels of several cytokines, which are biomarkers of inflammation, in the lung tissue model exposed to conventional cigarette smoke, as described in the study published in Applied In Vitro Toxicology, a peer-reviewed publication from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. The article is part of a special issue on Next Generation Nicotine Products and is available to media contacts upon request.
Anisha Banerjee and coauthors from British American Tobacco R&D Centre (Southampton, U.K.) used a commercially available 3D airway culture system comprised of reconstituted human epithelium, which mimics the structure and functions of human lung tissue. The researchers demonstrate how this model system, together with a protocol designed to deliver matched, repeated exposures to smoke or aerosol over a short period, can be applied in the laboratory to assess potential toxicity.
In the article entitled “Differential Gene Expression Using RNA-seq Profiling in a Reconstituted Airway Epithelium Exposed to Conventional Cigarette Smoke or Electronic Cigarette Aerosols,” they describe the molecular techniques used to measure gene expression and inflammatory biomarker levels.
“Next generation sequencing is revolutionizing and expanding the frontiers of genomic research to unravel the genetic information from any biological system,” explains Dr. Banerjee.
“The utilization of new human 3D lung models in combination with the latest gene expression technologies to evaluate the effects of conventional cigarette smoke versus electronic cigarette aerosols demonstrates how in vitro models can be used to understand biological effects,” says Jim McKim, PhD, Editor-in-Chief of Applied In Vitro Toxicology and Founder and CEO, IonTox, LLC.
Ridiculous. Transient physiological effects do not translate into little-understood heart disease which is a natural long-term degenerative process.
E-cigarette use in the UK may have reduced the number of long-term smokers by 18,000. Continue reading Study: E-cigs help smokers quit
The anti-vaping mob is trying to characterize vaping as a “gateway” to smoking — the exact opposite of the purpose of vaping. Continue reading Claim: Adolescent vaping causes adult smoking
Yet use ‘continues to surge.’ Continue reading Claim: More than half of EU citizens questioned now think e-cigarettes are harmful
The risks are “unknown,” claims the Post. Continue reading WaPo sweats secondhand vaping
The FDA knows from the chemical composition e-cig vapor and the smoking epidemiology that e-cigs are harmless. But it insists on regulating anyway. Continue reading FDA will require e-cigarettes and contents to be reviewed
“Experts estimate that exclusive e-cigarette use is associated with about five percent of the mortality risks of smoking.” Continue reading Top tobacco control experts to FDA: Studies of e-cigs suggest more benefit than harm
Uh… what young person has ever been killed by “pollution” or smoking? Continue reading Claim: Fewer U.S. youth dying from pollution, tobacco
But reducing risk of harm to health by 95% (versus tobacco) is not good enough for US behavior nannies. Continue reading The UK’s CDC is okay with e-cigs
As a lucrative 12-year long financial deal comes to an end, the EU threatens to cut ties with Philip Morris unless it gets an even better deal. EU concern for public health is just a pose. Continue reading EU doesn’t oppose smoking — just not getting its cut of tobacco sales