New e-mails obtained via the Freedom of Information Act indicate a top federal scientist expects EPA to be less than candid and to stonewall about its illegal human experiments.
NIEHS director Linda Birnbaum spends her integrity covering up for EPA researchers and Environmental Health Perspectives editor Hugh Tilson.
The whitewash of the EPA’s unethical, if not illegal, human experiments has gone interagency.
By Steve Milloy April 24, 2012, The Washington Times Which do you find more shocking: that the Environmental Protection Agency conducts experiments on humans that its own risk assessments would deem potentially lethal, or that it hides the results of those experiments from Congress and the public because they debunk those very same risk assessments?
Here’s Texas Congressman Joe Barton’s hard-hitting opening statement at the Feb. 28 EPA budget hearing.
Donora debunks this study.
Show us one.
Poverty, not “pollution,” is unhealthy.
As we’ve said, there are no benefits from reducing mercury emissions from power plants.
Who needs readings when you can see the soot?
Note to readers: JunkScience Sidebar has moved to a daily News & Views page available here.
You don’t often see a state essentially accuse the federal government of lying to Congress.