TUCSON, Ariz., Dec. 11, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — According to an article in the winter 2012 issue of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, research sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) violates “every law, regulation, and standard developed since World War II for the protection of human subjects.”
By Steve Milloy December 3, 2012, Washington Times Fewer than 1 in 5 Americans has any use for cigarettes nowadays, but here’s why the Obama Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has made smoking important to us all.
EPA tells the federal court hearing the illegal human testing suit that the agency answers to nothing and no one — i.e., no law and no judge.
By STEVE MILLOY October 23, 2012, Investor’s Business Daily | Print Version The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has been sued in federal court for conducting illegal experiments on human beings. A federal judge will now determine whether the EPA has violated federal law and the most sacrosanct moral standards of scientific research or whether the … Continue reading EPA's Dirty, Dark Secret
By Steve Milloy October 18, 2012, Washington Times The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been sued in federal court for allegedly conducting illegal experiments on human beings. The case tests whether a government agency can violate the law and the most sacrosanct ethics of scientific research — and get away scot-free.
MEDIA RELEASE October 1, 2012 Contact: Matt Dempsey Matt_Dempsey@epw.senate.gov (202) 224-9797 Katie Brown Katie_Brown@epw.senate.gov (202) 224-2160 Inhofe Asks for Hearing on EPA’s Alleged Conducting of Illegal Human Experiments Link to Letter Washington, D.C. – In the wake of the Obama – Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) being sued in federal court for allegedly conducting illegal human … Continue reading Inhofe Asks for Hearing on EPA's Alleged Conducting of Illegal Human Experiments
No — er, well, it shouldn’t be. In June 2005, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) took the EPA to task for some rather innocuous human studies involving pesticides. Click here for the Boxer-Waxman report As recounted in the report’s executive summary, EPA had committed the following misconduct: Human testing of … Continue reading Is this a partisan issue?
The EPA Human Experiments: Agency Scientists Ignore Rules for the Protection of Human Subjects Established After World War II and Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments Overview Since at least 2004 and up through the Obama administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been secretly testing highly toxic/lethal air pollutants on unhealthy human study subjects for the … Continue reading Summary
So let’s compare conduct of EPA and the University of North Carolina with the rules for protecting human subjects that have been set since World War II. EPA/UNC vs. the Nuremberg Code Voluntary and Informed Consent. At no time did EPA inform any study subject about how toxic (i.e., death within hours after any exposure, … Continue reading EPA vs. The Rules for Protection Human Study Subjects
The documents we have date from 2004. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosures (or lack of them) presented here survive through to experimentation undertaken as recently as 2011. There are three basic type of experiments of concern here: EPA exposing adults with metabolic syndrome, including the elderly, to PM2.5 (study “XCON” document analysis starts below); EPA … Continue reading Analysis of the EPA Documents (Part 1)
Second and third FOIA requests were sent to the EPA on April 20, 2012. The second request asked for: For the human experiments listed in the response to FOIA Request No. HQ-FOI-02235-11, I am requesting copies of the (1) the protocols and consent forms that were approved by the University of North Carolina (UNC) School … Continue reading Milloy Makes Additional FOIA Requests of EPA
On September 19, 2011, EPA medical officer Dr. Ghio responded to Steve Milloy’s September 15 inquiry about the nature of the concentrated ambient particles as follows [Click to enlarge]: “Fine” ambient particles are known as PM2.5 (pronounced “P-M-2-point-5”). What is PM2.5 and how does the EPA view it? Below is how EPA introduces its website … Continue reading The Most Toxic Substance on Earth