“You probably recall that unpleasant little incident at the Gold King mine in Colorado where they spilled millions of gallons of toxic sludge into the local river system.”
EPA claims that outside experts approved its disastrous plan at the Gold King Mine.
EPA made up its mind to block the Alaska gold mine before any permits were issued.
Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican and committee chairman, said this week that the agency’s behavior on the Pebble Mine project “demonstrates how the EPA is truly out of control.”
Why did the EPA spend $1.4 million on guns?
My latest on Breitbart…
My commentary in today’s Washington Times.
Watch Steve Milloy’s 38-minute dismantling of the Obama EPA’s most important junk science-based assumption — that fine particles from power plants kill people.
There’s good news and bad news. Click for my entire Breitbart column.
A good, but limited, victory against EPA.
Be there at 4pm or watch live online. Details…
Take a look at just the first “independent reviewer.”
Although no one knows exactly what the final form of the EPA rules will be, one thing is certain and that is EPA’s stated legal basis for the rules.
Amen to that.
EPA claims its CO2 rules will reduce electricity prices 8% by 2030. In an unreleased report, the Department of Energy begs to differ.
My how time flies — and nothing gets done.
The fake Willie Soon controversy comes back to bite Harvard in the rear.
Remember just two months ago when the media savaged climate skeptic Willie Soon for supposedly failing to disclose industry funding? It’s a pity the media doesn’t.
No CO2 rules. No new ozone rules. No more “science” grants or grants of any kind. No more regional offices… and less! It is no longer the 1970s. Environmental protection needs to be rethought.
Click for the letter.
On April 28, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will vote on this pet project of JunkScience.com:
What if you exposed humans to 300 parts per billion of ozone, while exercising or under heat stress, and nothing happened to them?
Final vote: 241-175.
JunkScience.com helped make this happen.
More on the ‘most transparent administration.”
Greenwire’s Robin Bravender and Amanda Peterka apparently can’t even manage he-said-she-said journalism. EPA said everything was okay and, well, what else matters — especially if you’re a journalist who wants to have access to EPA in the future?
The latest episode in the continuing saga of EPA’s illegal human experiments.
But the agency still defends the tests as necessary for public policy — yet another illegal rationale.
Statistician Stan Young shows how the real costs and imaginary benefits of the EPA CO2 rule are a deadly combination.
You may submit this information to EPA by December 1, 2014 as a public comment. A PDF of this fact sheet is here.
State and industry petitioners point out that the rule costs a real $1,500 for every $1 in hypothetical benefits “produced.” We have the petitions.
JunkScience.com coined the term “secret science” and worked on this issue for 18 years.
Read the entire letter and 40-page report.
There’s no evidence to support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) longstanding claim that fine airborne particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrograms or less (PM2.5) is killing thousands of Americans every year, according to the first comprehensive study of its kind.
Airborne Fine Particulate Matter and Short-Term Mortality: Exploring the California Experience,2007-2010.
The Top Ten Reasons The Government Shutdown Isn’t All Bad
About today’s Supreme Court decision to hear whether EPA can regulate stationary sources of CO2 (like power plants), Reuters reports:
BTW Ed, the EPA meetings are pro forma — i.e., designed to meet a coming court challenges to the rules, not to allow the public to weigh in.