Claim: Tighter air pollution standards may save thousands of lives, greatly improve public health
Not a bit of this claim is true.
Not a bit of this claim is true.
The agency enlists an elite group of scientists to rubber stamp illegal experiments.
The best “science” money can buy.
Frederica Perera makes the case that she is the dumbest “scientist” on Earth.
EPA is a crime against humanity.
If results are true, likely a socio-economic effect. The media release is below. ### Mom’s exposure to BPA during pregnancy can put her baby on course to obesity 94 percent of pregnant women studied had detectable levels of BPA, a chemical used in water bottles, canned foods, and paper receipts COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY’S MAILMAN SCHOOL OF … Continue reading Claim: Mom’s exposure to BPA during pregnancy can put her baby on course to obesity
The EPA’s cost-benefit analysis for its new rules to reduce methane emissions from the oil and gas industry overstate (if not fabricate) the benefits. EPA has overstated or invented these benefits in order to cover-up the huge costs associated with the rule.
Ozone triggers lying, not asthma.
Because the “safe” level of ozone keeps getting ratcheted lower… not because ambient ozone levels actually harm anyone.
Where’s the “social justice” in greens lying to poor people about the cause of their asthma and denying them jobs?
California air is not ‘dirty’ and my research shows it kills no one.
Blocking the Baltimore incinerator just blocks jobs. No one dies or gets asthma from outdoor air.