The recent “Harvard Howler” trying to link PM2.5 with COVID-19 deaths was funded by money Harvard received from the Obama EPA.
PM2.5 fraudsters move to change the biological plausibility narrative?
I was reading an article upcoming in this week’s New York Times Magazine when I was struck by a possible effort by the PM2.5 fraudsters to change their narrative.
Continue reading PM2.5 fraudsters move to change the biological plausibility narrative?
Video: Bill McKibben feigns ignorance of his funding sources
From Michael Moore’s new documentary, “Planet of the Humans,” uber-climate bedwetter Bill McKibben pulls a Sgt. Schultz when asked about his funding sources. I posted this when I learned that the film’s distributor has been pressured to remove it from YouTube because it exposes the corruption of the climate bedwetting movement.
Earth Day at 50: Progress, Not Politics, Cleaned Up America
My Earth Day column at RealClearPolitics.com… based on “Eco-Reality Strikes Back: Earth Day at 50”
Continue reading Earth Day at 50: Progress, Not Politics, Cleaned Up America
Eco-Reality Strikes Back: Earth Day at 50
As climate bedwetters hyperventilate about the state of the environment for the 50th anniversary of Earth Day, reality strikes back. Here is my summary of the state of our environment.
WaPo hits new low in air pollution photo fraud
In its “report” of the the Trump EPA’s decision not to tighten PM2.5 standards, the Washington Post ran this photo:
But…
Continue reading WaPo hits new low in air pollution photo fraud
WINNING: EPA won’t tighten the PM2.5 standard
A big win for all who have worked on this. We’re not done yet. But a big win nonetheless. You can read the wailings of the PM2.5 fraudsters in the New York Times coverage (Web | PDF). Incredible that the fraudsters launched their PM2.5-coronavirus study as a last minute “Hail Mary.” Also note the fake news headline — “Trump Disregards Advice.” In fact, EPA’s CASAC advised Administrator Wheeler that there was no scientific basis for tightening the standards.
A Tribute to Fred Singer
Cost-benefit analysis for the COVID lockdown
Regulatory agencies like EPA use cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to justify regulations. Let apply some back-of-the-envelope CBA to the current COVID lockdown.
Continue reading Cost-benefit analysis for the COVID lockdown
FLASHBACK from 2002: What is WHO doing?
I bashed WHO for incompetence and corruption way before it became popular during the coronavirus crisis. Here is my FoxNews.com column from May 17, 2002.
ExxonMobil keeps lying on climate
ExxonMobil’s 2020 proxy statement (for its annual shareholder meeting) has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It includes my shareholder proposal requesting that ExxonMobil be honest about the costs and benefits of its climate-related activities. ExxonMobil insists on lying — even though the SEC agrees with me. My proposal and ExxonMobil’s response are below.
