If air pollution kills, why doesn’t it kill the Chinese?
The New York Times editorial page is using this photo of Shanghai to promote the myth that air pollution kills.
The New York Times editorial page is using this photo of Shanghai to promote the myth that air pollution kills.
Statistician Stan Young shows how the real costs and imaginary benefits of the EPA CO2 rule are a deadly combination.
You may submit this information to EPA by December 1, 2014 as a public comment. A PDF of this fact sheet is here.
Robert Phalen has spent a life studying air pollution.
Thanks Paul for this essay, I assume soon to be up on Townhall
The Minority Staffers on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee issued a report on the Beal/Brenner/EPA Scandal.
Let’s see if we can summarize the human experiments scandal.
Look at this lovely lie–the WHO claims 7 million deaths in 2012 due to air pollution. No such thing. They base their claims on research that is so bad that the US EPA has authorized unethical human experiments to try to salvage the nonsense of their death claims. The US EPA death claims are the … Continue reading World Health Organization lays an egg
Note from Fred, Brother in Law, Trucking company exec, interested in my battle with the EPA and the CARB on small particulates for many years.
So another big study comes up with a Relative Risk of miniscule size for exposure to air pollution.
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons Journal announces publication of an article condemning the EPA junk science on air pollution, imagine that.
There’s no evidence to support the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) longstanding claim that fine airborne particulate matter measuring 2.5 micrograms or less (PM2.5) is killing thousands of Americans every year, according to the first comprehensive study of its kind.