12 thoughts on “Court dismisses Michael Mann defamation lawsuit against National Review”

  1. @Dreed: You are correct, the trial is a go. The “discovery” phase will be interesting. Perhaps it will be a milestone in Dr. Mann’s celebrated career …. a milestone which will sink it that is.

  2. I would like to know if they’ve counter sued and if so will they pursue it now? I also wonder at this point where the court stands on Mann’s SLAPP suit against Styne? Tim Ball won but I can’t find anything showing him pursuing a counter suit. When Styne wins I certainly hope his counter suit will prevail against Mann and hopefully David Suzuki.

  3. The now-documented fraud the Mann tried to pull off with his infamous “hockey stick” graph should be sufficient to confirm that he ruined his own reputation (such as it might have been), and there is nothing left for anyone else to subsequently harm.

  4. The Mark Steyn suit needs to be dismissed quickly. With prejudice and with court costs assigned to be paid to Steyn and CEI.

  5. In all seriousness, this could have been a good venue to further embarrass and marginalize the climate hyperventilists.

    Not that they need much help.

  6. It is fitting that this decision came out just as Trump is about to become President and upset the AGW scam.

  7. Well, little Mikey hurt my “feelings” and a lot of pocketbooks.
    He needs to be dragged through the courts in a class action.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.