No, Mark. They were stolen from Heartland.
Mark Fischetti’s Scientific American article “The Peter Gleick Incident: All Heat and No Light” is subtitled “Will the unethical release of documents from the controversial Heartland Institute undermine climate science?”
I guess Gleick was legal in the release of some of the documents, considering he fabricated them. Still unethical, but legal.
But the ones he stole… I see an orange jumper in his future (if there is any justice in this world).
Just about since Martin Gardner left SI.
Scientific American is neither. Been that way since the mid seventies.
(un)Scientific (un)America has been a waste of trees for years now. They got infested with extreme libtard editorial board. I and many others dropped our subscriptions a long way back. Too bad. I used to really like it. Then it got stupid.