This is a new PM2/5/ozone analysis from Stan Young et al. It uses a different methodology from last year’s California study on the same California data. Same answer, though. And the data is available from the study authors — something the EPA-funded air pollution mafia refuses to share.
Continue reading New Study: Still no association between PM2.5, ozone and premature death
Check out my line-by-line comments on her embarrassing essay in this week’s Nature.
Continue reading Fake ‘science historian’ Naomi Oreskes attacks EPA science transparency proposal
A memo prepared by the University of Washington’s Alison Cullen for the upcoming EPA Science Advisory Board meeting exposes the plot.
Continue reading Air Pollution Mafia Attempting to Sabotage EPA Science Transparency Rulemaking
The combination of the Washington Post printing an op-ed by a conservative economist supporting the Scott Pruitt-led EPA’s science transparency initiative, which then becomes an EPA media release… well, that just doesn’t happen every day!
I’ve always suspected that Stanford University professor John Ioannidis was only posing as a science reformer. His commentary in PLoS against the EPA science transparency rulemaking validates that.
Now finally available in PDF format, here is my 1994 report on science policy that the Clinton Administration tried to suppress. You can use it to comment on the just proposed EPA science transparency rule.
Despite support from President Trump and EPA chief Scott Pruitt, Tommy Fitzgerald’s incredible American success story runs into a Chinese wall.
Get your comments to EPA before May 30, 2018.
Continue reading EPA officially proposes science transparency rule; 30-day comment period begins
In the “Today’s Debate” section of USA Today, I take the opposite view of the USA Today editors.
Continue reading Milloy in USA Today: Scott Pruitt should stay at EPA
With the aid of the University of Washington’s Joel D. Kaufman (an EPA-funded human experimenter),Popular Science attempts a hatchet job on the Trump EPA’s plan to ban secret science. Here are my in-line comments.
Continue reading Popular Science chimes with lies about the EPA secret science ban
In the wake of Tuesday’s EPA secret science announcement, the ever-hopeful Steve Milloy gave 30-minute (at least) interview to New Yorker writer Carolyn Kormann, challenging her to go to Harvard’s Dog Dockery (no slight to biological canines intended) and Brigham Young’s Clive Arden Pope, III to get actually responses to my charges of fraud against them and their PM2.5 research. But Kormann failed miserably. Here’s what Dockery said, or at least what she reported, with my in-line comments.
Check out Brigham Young University junk scientist Clive Arden Pope, III’s ridiculous comments on the recent EPA proposal that would ban his secret science.
Continue reading Arden Pope keeps lying about his secret science