Maybe It’s Time to Review the EPA’s Endangerment Finding

My letter in today’s Wall Street Journal responding to the recent misguided WSJ editorial calling for the Trump administration to ignore the Obama EPA’s finding that CO2 endangers the public welfare.

Continue reading Maybe It’s Time to Review the EPA’s Endangerment Finding

Report: Shots fired at University of Alabama laboratory of climate skeptics

As reported by University of Alabama-Huntsville scientist, Roy Spencer:

FYI, apparently sometime after a March for Science went past our building at UAH, 7 shots were fired and hit the floor John Christy is on. (I’m in a different part of the same building). No witnesses. I’m assuming late night Saturday or Sunday.

It seems pretty obvious this was a message being sent. If fired from a pistol, all shots hitting the same floor seems to suggest deliberate aim…

I doubt any media have covered it yet. I doubt the police have even written a report yet. From what I’ve heard, it sounds like the police believe the shots were fired from a passing car, and some shell casings were recovered, as well as fragments of bullets inside the building.

It’s covered now.

EPA sabotaging Trump effort to save coal?

No doubt it’s the Obama holdovers who still run the agency on a day-to-day basis.

This clip is from a brief filed in March 22, 2017 by the (supposedly) Trump EPA in litigation over the major war-on-coal EPA rule known as the Mercury Air Transport Standard (MATS).

As you can see, the Obama holdovers in the Trump EPA are telling the court that the rule will save 11,000 lives per year — all by reducing PM emissions from coal stacks.

Below is the background story on all this from Greenwire.

Readers of this page and “Scare Pollution” know the saving-11,000-lives claim is utterly false. the real number is ZERO.

As per the Greenwire story, EPA filed a motion this week stating the March 22 brief may not actually be its position. What the EPA is referring to as “not being its position” is unclear — i.e., it may or may not not include the saving-11,000-lives claim.

Here’s where the rubber hits the road, though.

The legal merits of coal industry arguments aside, I’m not sure how anyone can reasonably expect D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Democrats (or even Republicans) to rule in their favor if they think the EPA MATS rule is saving 11,000 lives per year.

If the PM2.5-kills myth is allowed to continue and is indeed promoted by the Trump EPA, the rollback of the Obama war on coal will only last as long as pro-coal Republicans control the White House and are not forced by SCOTUS to continue the war on coal. Ever-wobbly and environmentally under-informed Justice Anthony Kennedy may indeed believe that coal kills. If he does he will be the 5-4 vote forcing/allowing EPA to destroy coal.

Claim: BP oil spill did $17.2 billion in damage to natural resources, scientists find

Ridiculous. The real number is much closer to, if not zero. Reminds me of the first environmental project I ever worked on.

Continue reading Claim: BP oil spill did $17.2 billion in damage to natural resources, scientists find

JunkScience forces federal toxics chief into nonsensical defense of EPA’s illegal human experiments

A revealing e-mail exchange involving Linda Birnbaum, the director of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences and National Toxicology Program.

Continue reading JunkScience forces federal toxics chief into nonsensical defense of EPA’s illegal human experiments

EPA’s Human Experiments Hypocrisy with Chlorpyrifos

Yes, I’m old enough to remember when Clinton EPA chief Carol Browner condemned human experiments that were being used to support the continued sale of the insecticide chlorpyrifos.

Continue reading EPA’s Human Experiments Hypocrisy with Chlorpyrifos