Scientific American reports:
Piers Forster, a climate-change researcher at the University of Leeds, UK, and one of the authors of the summary, says: “The policy relevance of the information is that if you do not start mitigating [ie reducing emissions] tomorrow we will have to start to consider these unattractive options.”
I’m surprised that the “scientific” community isn’t totally embarrassed by idiotic statements like this. Maybe it shows there isn’t much science other than the political flavor in the IPCC>
Mr Burns, in the Simpsons, once launched a huge satellite sunshade over Springfield, so the people would have to buy his nuclear station’s power.
But I think it was just a cartoon…..
Nothing the “unScientific” American is worth reading anymore. I don’t. It’s been quite a “rag” for some time.
Maybe we have to start eliminating watermelons…..
But that is ultimately what the watermelons want
Geoengineering . . . billions will die.