Hard to believe taxpayers have given $350 million to these whiners to do nonsense research that returns zero to taxpayers. Continue reading Climatologist Drama Queens: Government shutdown claimed to cause ‘irreversible damage’ to ‘decades of scientific research’
About today’s Supreme Court decision to hear whether EPA can regulate stationary sources of CO2 (like power plants), Reuters reports: Continue reading Dishonest: EPA chief says Obama climate plan not threatened by SCOTUS review of EPA authority over coal plants
BTW Ed, the EPA meetings are pro forma — i.e., designed to meet a coming court challenges to the rules, not to allow the public to weigh in. Continue reading Sen. Malarkey claims shutdown prevents public from discussing EPA coal rules — But EPA propaganda tour ≠ discussion
Though the Supreme Court announced it will rule whether EPA greenhouse gas authority extends to stationary sources (like coal power plants), Justice Alito recused himself from the process deciding whether to take the case. Continue reading Here’s Justice Alito’s financial disclosure form — what’s the conflict with his participating in EPA CO2 rule case?
The Washington Post reports: Continue reading Shock: Alito could torpedo Supreme Court review of EPA CO2 rules by recusing himself
“Without journalists to uncover stories and speak to authoritative sources, the public loses,” says an editor. But science is not received wisdom. Virtually all science reporters have yet to figure that out. Who-says-what isn’t important. What’s important is how they know what they claim. Continue reading No Loss: Science reporters becoming an endangered species — But almost all are dodos, anyway
Naomi Oreskes to review the IPCC? Hah! Would gladly pay to see Donna Laframboise do it, though. Continue reading Damage Control: IPCC considering whether to have U.S. taxpayers pay to have friendly sociologists ‘study’ and glorify its process