Luboš Motl writes at the Reference Frame:
When I saw some reports about the IPCC’s 95 percent “certainty” that the global warming is mostly man-made, I couldn’t avoid thinking about the huge difference between hard sciences (such as particle physics) and soft sciences (such as the contemporary climatology)…
First of all, the figure 95% …
Lubos: Just blindingly brilliant!!!! But don’t expect the climate clowns to understand any of your analysis, or, at least to accept your reasoning. They have already made up their minds like when the report of 2007 was written after the summary. Remember that Phil Jones publicly admitted that the catastrophic figure of 2 centigrade warming is pulled out of thin air.
Keep up the good work!