Laframboise: Where Do Gleick’s Apologists Draw the Line?

“What else is acceptable? Old fashioned burglary? Arson? Car bombs?”

Donna Laframboise writes:

In November 2009, in the wake of the first release of Climategate documents, I found myself asking rhetorical questions:

“To those minimizing ClimateGate: How badly do people have to behave? What line must they cross before you’ll stop excusing them?”

I am now pondering similar questions regarding the Peter Gleick affair. Two weeks have passed since this story broke. This is what we know:..

Read the entire posting.

2 thoughts on “Laframboise: Where Do Gleick’s Apologists Draw the Line?”

  1. So Gleick’s behavior was morally right and justified.

    By that logic, falsifying scientific data to “prove” what one thinks is morally right is also justified.

  2. Visit the AGU website and read the presidents full statement on this issue, in part this event has….”produced fresh fuel for the unproductive and seemingly endless ideological firestorm surrounding the reality of Earth’s changing climate”, 27Feb2012. Support the triumph of Post Modern Science and be quite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.