Climate alarmism is not Lysenkoism because…

… Obama is not a socialist?

While foaming at the mouth about the recent WSJ op-ed by 16 prominent skeptics which likens alarmism to Lysenkoism, English major Chris Mooney writes,

… the Lysenko charge is self refuting—really, a lot like the charge that President Obama is a socialist.

Giving English major Mooney the benefit of the doubt, perhaps he believes Obama’s denials abotu being a socialist — e.g., speaking before the Business Roundtable in February 2010, Obama denied that he was a socialist, stating:

“Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, I am an ardent believer in the free market… We have arrived at a juncture in our politics where reasonable efforts to update our regulations, or make basic investments in our future, are too often greeted with cries of ‘government takeover’ or even ‘socialism’…” [Emphasis added]

Now check out this excerpt from James Mann’s The Rebellion of Ronald Reagan: A History of the End of the Cold War (Viking 2009):

In a 1960 letter to Playboy publisher Hugh Hefner, who had published an article by [screenwriter and Communist Party member Dalton Trumbo] and defended his right to freedom of speech, Reagan recalled how his views [on communism] had been formed during [the late-1940s]. “I once thought exactly as you think… It took seven months of meeting communists and communist-influenced people across a table in almost daily sessions while pickets rioted in front of studio gates, homes were bombed and a great industry almost ground to a halt.” What bothered Reagan above all, he wrote, was the discovery that Communist Party members operated in secret and did not tell the truth. “I, like you, will defend the right of any American to openly practice and preach any political philospophy from monarchy to anarchy,” he told Hefner. “But this is not the case with regard to the communist. He is bound by party discipline to deny that he is a communist so that he can by subversion and stealth impose on an unwilling people the rule of the International Communist Party which is in fact the government of Soviet Russia.” Anticommunism for Reagan, then, was not primarily foreign policy or geopolitics; it was personal and moralistic in nature, driven by his experiences with people he considered sophisticated and devious, who did not abide by the small-town Midwestern values he had absorbed in his youth.

While Obama claims to be for the free market and that his policies are not socialist, all his actions, policies and proposals are in actuality anti-free market and socialist — e.g., higher taxes, class warfare, the auto takeover, cap-and-trade, increased financial and environmental regulation, green energy subsidies, and nationalized health care to name just a few. Moreover, Obama has surrounded himself with admitted socialists and communists, like Carol Browner, Van Jones to name just two.

It’s hard to take seriously people who disavow their own political philosophy.

Read English major Mooney’s commentary.

Read the Wall Street Journal op-ed.

3 thoughts on “Climate alarmism is not Lysenkoism because…”

  1. Mooney bills himself as a ‘science journalist’, and as an expert in that field. Funny how he relies on a useless analogy to make his point. He needs to take Logic 101.

  2. Vladimir Ilyich Lenin quoted in Max Eastman : Reflections on the Failure of Socialism :

    We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, law-breaking, withholding and concealing truth. We can and must write in a language which sows among the masses hate, revulsion, scorn, and the like, towards those who disagree with us.

  3. Shutting people up by attacking them instead of their inarguable postiion is not Lysenkoism because …
    Obama doesn’t have any gulags yet?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.