You mean there’s problem with a (foreign) company conspiring with the U.S. government to rig emissions tests to kill a (domestic) competitor?
The criminal conspiracy to destroy the glider truck industry is expanding. I guess the Journal of the American Medical Association wants to be part of it.
Keying off the upcoming summit with North Korea, the New York Times’ Coral Davenport attempts an extensive hatchet job on science under Trump. Nowhere in the article does she disclose that she is married to (as of last year, anyway) “an intelligence analyst at the Energy Department in Washington, where he focuses on foreign nuclear weapons programs.” What a co-inky-dink. I love New York Times wedding announcements. It’s how I got the Washington Post‘s Juliet Eilperin reassigned from her environmental beat a few years ago. Here is my line-by-line commentary.
Continue reading NYTimes attacks Trump on science — and it turns out to be quite revealing
Emails obtained via the Freedom of Information Act confirm that China-owned Volvo Trucks conspired with Obama-holdover EPA career staff to destroy the glider truck industry. This should also be embarrassing news for reporters like the New York Times’ Eric Lipton and the Los Angeles Times’ Evan Halper who wittingly or unwittingly have been propagandizing for Volvo against gliders under the guise of journalism.
Thank you, Administrator Scott Pruitt — greatest EPA chief ever.
Continue reading More Winning: EPA Administrator Pruitt Proposes Cost-Benefit Analysis Reform
Here is my line-by-line of Evan Halper’s error-filled report in the Los Angeles Times.
By design, the public comment period at today’s EPA Science Advisory Board meeting will feature only Trump EPA opponents.
Continue reading ‘Resistance’ games EPA Science Advisory Board meeting
If you’re going to be in Washington, DC on July 17, you can make oral comments on the EPA proposal. Click for the Federal Register notice.
Arden Pope had 14 months to find an error in Jim Enstrom’s 2017 redo and takedown of Pope’s 1995 study. Despite Pope’s arm-waving no actual error was found.
Here is the paragraph of Enstrom’s response:
Read Enstrom’s entire response published in Dose-Response.
Background/Additional Reading
The letters are finally published for last December’s junk science-powered PM2.5 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association. We made huge progress.
Wait until President Trump finds out about this, Mick.
There will be a public hearing in Washington DC on July 17. Comments due by August 17.
