Despite the predictions of the junk science mob and despite air as bad as in China or India. But as JunkScience has long argued.

Continue reading Smoke-choked Seattle NOT experiencing more asthma cases
Despite the predictions of the junk science mob and despite air as bad as in China or India. But as JunkScience has long argued.

Continue reading Smoke-choked Seattle NOT experiencing more asthma cases
Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Past the scientific misconduct and illegal human experiments with taxpayer dollar, looks like consumers wasted billions on catalytic converters.

Continue reading Researcher claims EPA carbon monoxide rules based on fabricated data
Below is how The Hill positioned its report about a recent court ruling involving the Trump EPA’s bid to rein in the Obama EPA’s (junk science-fueled) ozone rule.

Statistician and JunkScience.com friend Stan Young’s presentation at the American Statistical Society.

Continue reading Stan Young: Negative Findings in Epidemiology
My op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal.
Continue reading A Step Toward Scientific Integrity at the EPA
You probably know where I come down on this. A new study spotlights this issue in spades.

EPA has claimed that reducing PM2.5 concentrations can save 570,000 lives in the U.S. every year (i.e., prevent one-quarter of all deaths annually).

The New England Journal of Medicine recently stepped in it with the publication of bogus study on PM2.5 and death. I have called for the NEJM to retract the study. Jim Enstrom has a different suggestion.

Continue reading Epidemiologist Enstrom makes ‘medical’ journal an offer it can’t refuse
Then you’re invited to Capitol Hill for an actual free lunch (and free learning) as Steve Milloy presents his new book, ‘Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA’!

We will see how much of the U.S. scientific establishment is willing to have its reputation dragged into the gutter inhabited by the air pollution fraudsters.

Continue reading Retraction request made for NEJM air pollution-kills study
More EPA-funded air quality science fraud?
