JunkScience requests federal research misconduct investigation for air pollution study
A fraudulent study to advance political and research payola agendas deserves exposure and punishment.
A fraudulent study to advance political and research payola agendas deserves exposure and punishment.
Past the scientific misconduct and illegal human experiments with taxpayer dollar, looks like consumers wasted billions on catalytic converters.
The AP reports:
Institutional involvement and/or cover-up doesn’t matter? Even if the institution gets $600 million per year from NIH? Really?
By Steve Milloy JunkScience.com, March 2019 Background: What is an “endocrine disruptor”? An endocrine disruptor (also called an “environmental estrogen”) is supposedly any one of a variety of chemicals that, at extremely low-level exposures, well below those considered safe by EPA and other regulatory authorities, disrupt the human or animal hormonal system to cause diseases … Continue reading The Endocrine Disrupter Scare
The draft CLARITY-BPA report should go a long way toward sweeping the “endocrine disrupter” scare into the ash bin of junk science history. BTW, JunkScience.com was there to point out the scare’s stupidity from the very beginning IN 1996.
And the DHHS Office of Research Integrity gets a referral as well. Read Dunn’s letters to JAMA and ORI.
Does an e-mail obtained by JunkScience.com reveal an attempted bribe (is there another word?) to EPA employees for helping Harvard get a lucrative Kuwaiti contract?
The New York Times weeps this morning for the NINE jobs in EPA’s endocrine disruption program that President Trump has put on the chopping block. JunkScience.com readers will recall the fraudulent origin of these jobs.
The dose makes the poison and “any” exposure is not the same as being “poisoned.”
So Joe Bast, who is a busy boy, now sends me summaries or a digest, if you prefer, of the mag Nature.
Ok, some of you might say, you’re nothing but a conduit for Bast.