Since the days of the EPA secondhand smoke risk assessment, JunkScience.com has had contempt for the bogus statistical technique of meta-analysis. We have also taken the lead in exposing as fraud claims that ambient air quality kills people. JunkScience.com friend Stan Young has just published a new paper dismantling a major 2012 air quality study (headlined below) as the product of publication bias and p-hacking, thus exposing its meta analysis methodology as just a bunch of junk.
Month: March 2019
Study: No kids ‘poisoned’ by lead in Flint water
Child blood lead levels actually slightly declined from harmless to even less harmless during the crisis. This study has been out for two weeks. No media outlet has reported it. It was much more fun and profitable for the #FakeNews media to report the scare as below.
Continue reading Study: No kids ‘poisoned’ by lead in Flint water
Who was LNT inventor Herman Muller? A lunatic eugenicist-communist.
The guy who saddled the world with the junk science-fueled linear no-threshold model of carcinogenesis was a fraudster — as Ed Calabrese has well documented and JunkScience.com has spotlighted. But science fraud is really only part of Muller’s story. Before science fraud, there was Muller’s idea of eugenics-for-communism.
Continue reading Who was LNT inventor Herman Muller? A lunatic eugenicist-communist.
Duke University pays feds $112.5 million in science fraud case
Duke University will pay $112.5 million to the United States Government to settle Thomas v. Duke, a lawsuit alleging that a research technician improperly falsified and fabricated data from 2006 to 2013 to obtain research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other federal agencies, the university announced Monday. This case includes air quality research fraud previsouly mentioned on this page.
Continue reading Duke University pays feds $112.5 million in science fraud case
Calabrese: The Troubled History of Cancer Risk Assessment
The Nobel-winning inventor of the LNT model, Hermann Muller, also thought it would be a great idea to have a sperm bank stocked with the sperm of great men like Karl Marx and Lenin. It is no surprise that the LNT turned out to be entirely bogus. Ed Calabrese explains in his latest article.
The Air Quality Science Fraud Empire strikes back
Thanks to EPA Administrator Wheeler, CASAC chair Tony Cox and other Trump administration appointees, EPA is moving away from the air quality science fraud spotlighted in my 2016 book “Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA.” This week the Air Quality Science Fraud Empire strikes back with a one-lie-after-another commentary in Science magazine.
Continue reading The Air Quality Science Fraud Empire strikes back
No… glyphosate, chlorpyrifos and other pesticides NOT linked with autism
More crappy epidemiology. Weak (non)-associations based on totally guesstimated exposures to God knows what and when projected on to a vague spectrum developmental disorder. I’m only posting this because I wasted part of my life scanning the study. Remember: Pesticides work. Crappy epidemiology doesn’t.
Continue reading No… glyphosate, chlorpyrifos and other pesticides NOT linked with autism
Normal, honest and pro-America scientists and experts express strong support for President Trump’s Commission on Climate Security
No… soda doesn’t kill… but the corruption will
A new study claims that drinking soda increases the risk of death. This is only true if you rip a soda can in half and slash your throat with it. So no, soda doesn’t kill… but the corruption will kill you.
Continue reading No… soda doesn’t kill… but the corruption will
State AGs Undermine Themselves on Climate
WINNING: EPA science advisory panel trashes draft EPA PM2.5 assessment as non-scientific, incomplete
The days of EPA science advisers rubber-stamping EPA staff’s regurgitation of the EPA-paid advisors own junk science have come to an end.
For historical background on the PM2.5 saga and PM2.5 science reality, read “Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA.”
New Calabrese: A comprehensive assessment of the LNT’s historical and scientific foundations
If you’ve missed Calabrese’s work so far… catch up on the LNT controversy with his latest paper: “The LNT single-hit dose-response model for cancer risk assessment was conceived, formulated, and applied in a manner which is now known to have been scientifically invalid.”