The Never-ending Case of Michael Mann v. Free Speech: Good News, Bad News

A new ruling from the DC Court of Appeals in today. What you need to know.

To cut to the chase, two points the Court decided:

  • The bogus Climategate investigations by Penn State et al. are enough to get Mann to a jury trial on whether he was defamed by National Review et al.
  • Mann has presented no evidence to suggested he was emotionally scarred by being compared to Penn State pedophile Jerry Sandusky. Claim dismissed with prejudice.

Read the Court opinion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading