Claim: Degrading ice wedges reshape Arctic landscape

Melting at 7 degrees F?

The media release is below.


Degrading ice wedges reshape Arctic landscape

Ice wedges, a common subsurface feature in permafrost landscapes, appear to be rapidly melting throughout the Arctic, according to a new study published today in the journal Nature Geoscience.

The wedges, which can be the size of a house, gradually formed over hundreds or even thousands of years as water seeped into permafrost cracks. On the ground surface, they form polygon shapes roughly 15-30 meters wide — a defining characteristic of northern landscapes.

The micro-topographic features of ice wedge polygons affect drainage, snow distribution and the general wetness or dryness of a landscape.

Anna Liljedahl, an assistant professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ Water and Environmental Research Center, and her co-authors gathered information about the types of ice-wedge polygons and how they changed over time across the Arctic. They collected the information while performing various other permafrost studies.

Although these regions contain “cold permafrost,” with an overall average temperature of about 7 degrees Fahrenheit, surface thawing still occurred at all of the 10 study sites.

Ice wedge degradation has been observed before in individual locations, but this is the first study to determine that rapid melting has become widespread throughout the Arctic.

“Here we’re combining observations from people working in the field across the Arctic — Russia, Canada and Alaska — where we’re seeing the same ice wedge melting phenomenon,” said Liljedahl, the lead author of the study.

Such thawing could bring significant changes to the hydrology of much of the Arctic as it alters the ground-surface topography. Melting of ice wedge tops makes the ground that surrounds the polygons subside, which in turn allows drainage of ice-wedge polygon centers. This can create a connective drainage system that encourages runoff and therefore an overall drying of the landscape.

“It’s really the tipping point for the hydrology,” Liljedahl said. “Suddenly you’re draining the landscape and creating more runoff, even if the amount of precipitation remains the same. Instead of being absorbed by the tundra, the snowmelt water will run off into lakes and larger rivers. It really is a dramatic hydrologic change across the tundra landscape.”

A comprehensive satellite image survey hasn’t been done to determine how common polygon ice wedge patterns are in permafrost areas, but as much as two-thirds of the Arctic landscape is suited to their formation, Liljedahl said.

Gradual warming of permafrost has been well-documented in the Arctic, but the polygon study indicates that a brief period of unusual warmth can cause a rapid shift in a short time period.

At the sites that were studied, ice wedge degradation occurred in less than a decade. In some cases, a single unusually warm summer was enough to cause more than 10 centimeters of surface subsidence, enough to result in pooling and runoff in an otherwise relatively flat landscape.

Vladimir Romanovsky, a UAF geophysics professor who monitored ice wedge degradation for the study at a site in Canada, said the overall conclusions of the study were striking.

“We were not expecting to see these dramatic changes,” he said. “We could see some other places where ice wedges were melting, but they were all related to surface disturbances, or it happened a long time ago. Whatever is happening, it’s something new for at least the last 60 years in the Arctic.”


4 thoughts on “Claim: Degrading ice wedges reshape Arctic landscape”

  1. Your first sentence expresses disbelief that “melting” was reported “at 7 degrees F” which seems absurd; however the quoted release states surface thawing was observed in regions with “an overall average temperature of about 7 degrees F” not, of course, that the thawing occurred at 7 degrees F. Year-round temperatures in the arctic routinely vary ~100 degrees F over the course of each year. The first lecture I heard as a college student made fun of the person who drowned trying to wade across a stream he was assured averaged just 2 feet deep.

  2. I don’t know what all the fuss is. Are we not in an interglacial warm period? Would any area with ice, when temperatures sometimes stray above freezing (AVERAGE 7 degrees), not see melting and change? Nuts, even sublimation remove water from the permafrost.

    They only imply — or perhaps assume and desire others to agree — there is some nefarious connection to SUV emissions.

  3. Arctic in 1923-

    “is “hardly recognisable as the same
    region of 1868 to 1917.”
    Many of the old landmarks are
    greatly altered, or no longer exist.
    Where formerly there were great
    masses of ice, these have melted
    away leaving behind them accumula-
    tions of earth and stones such as
    geologists call “moraines.” At many
    points where glaciers extend far into
    the sea half a dozen years ago they
    have now entirely disappeared”

  4. I am surprised that never mentioned in this article that it could be underground based heating (volcanic in nature) possibly. The Antarctic area is colder and ice is growing and thickening at the same time, so that there could be some subsurface heat arising from the Earths mantle below affecting surface ice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.