Latest in enviro people-hating — The Anthropocene: Hard evidence for a human-driven Earth

Enviros should just be honest and call it what they really want to: the Misanthropocene epoch.

The media release is below.


The Anthropocene: Hard evidence for a human-driven Earth
Evidence for a new geological epoch which marks the impact of human activity on the Earth is now overwhelming according to a recent paper by an international group of geoscientists

The evidence for a new geological epoch which marks the impact of human activity on the Earth is now overwhelming according to a recent paper by an international group of geoscientists. The Anthropocene, which is argued to start in the mid-20th Century, is marked by the spread of materials such as aluminium, concrete, plastic, fly ash and fallout from nuclear testing across the planet, coincident with elevated greenhouse gas emissions and unprecedented trans-global species invasions.

An international group of scientists is studying whether human activity has driven the Earth into a new geological epoch – the Anthropocene. They ask: to what extent are human actions recorded as measurable signals in geological strata, and is the Anthropocene world markedly different from the stable Holocene Epoch of the last 11,700 years that allowed human civilization to develop?

The Holocene Epoch has been a time during which human societies advanced by gradually domesticating the land to increase food production, built urban settlements and became proficient at developing the water, mineral and energy resources of the planet. The proposed Anthropocene Epoch, however, is marked as a time of rapid environmental change brought on by the impact of a surge in human population and increased consumption during the ‘Great Acceleration’ of the mid-20th century.

Dr Colin Waters of the British Geological Survey said: “Humans have long affected the environment, but recently there has been a rapid global spread of novel materials including aluminium, concrete and plastics, which are leaving their mark in sediments. Fossil-fuel combustion has dispersed fly ash particles worldwide, pretty well coincident with the peak distribution of the ‘bomb spike’ of radionuclides generated by atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.” “All of this shows that there is an underlying reality to the Anthropocene concept”, commented Jan Zalasiewicz of the University of Leicester, a co-author and working group Chair.

The study, co-authored by 24 members of the Anthropocene Working Group, shows that humans have changed the Earth system sufficiently to produce a range of signals in sediments and ice, and these are sufficiently distinctive to justify recognition of an Anthropocene Epoch in the Geological Time Scale. In 2016 the Anthropocene Working Group will gather more evidence on the Anthropocene, which will help inform recommendations on whether this new time unit should be formalized and, if so, how it might be defined and characterized.

A number of UK members of the group have contributed to this study, Colin Waters (lead author and Secretary of the group) and Michael Ellis, both from the British Geological Survey, Jan Zalasiewicz, Mark Williams and Matt Edgeworth from Leicester University and Colin Summerhayes from Cambridge University have provided significant input to this study and maintain the UK’s strong involvement in research into the Anthropocene concept.


5 thoughts on “Latest in enviro people-hating — The Anthropocene: Hard evidence for a human-driven Earth”

  1. The ‘anthropocene’ refers to that period of time where human existence has left evidence in the geological record.
    All life exists only because it consumes resources from its environment and dumps its wastes into the environment. Humans are no exception.
    The amazing thing should be that human technology has progressed to the point that evidence of our existence other than our mortal remains can now be routinely found and identified hundreds of thousands of years after the wastes are discarded.
    We must recognize that, as much as anything else, this reflects improvements on our ability to read the geological record.

  2. Gee, with a name like “Anthropocene Working Group” its hard to imagine they would come to any other conclusions. Confirmation bias much?

  3. Seems as though these ignoramuses are saying it would be best if we leave absolutely no record of our existence, as if we were never here. Boy, would that drive geoscientists a million years from now crazy, or what?

  4. The proper name for the present period is the “Academicene” – which is observed in the geological record following the PC transition (a thick white deposit of thinly layered PC tree-based carbon material that contains strange markets and PC incantations )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.