3 thoughts on “AP allows Nobel prize faker Michael Mann to grade GOP candidates on climate”

  1. There was a time when somebody received the Nobel Prize, they deserved and was respected enough to get it. Carter, Gore, Obama, simply shot the prestigious award off the pedestal of respect and creditability. People cannot see that it is so liberal bias that it cannot be fair. What did Obama do for peace before he received the award? Gore, what did he do positive for global warming? to me a Nobel Prize winner generally will know nothing more than the next liberal about the issues.

  2. This was my comment on the article:

    That is not a representative group of scientists. All of the AP’s eight chosen experts are apparently global warming alarmists, most of them extremists.

    The list starts with Penn State’s notorious Michael Mann and ends with his colleague, William Easterling. That is probably the American climate research group with the least credibility of all. To hear what another prominent global warming alarmist had to say about that group’s shocking scientific malpractice, Google-search or search on YouTube for:

    Climategate hide the decline explained by Berkeley professor Richard A. Muller

    Huber once wrote a paper describing the effects of “21-degree [Celsius] warming,” which is wildly beyond the realm of possibility.

    Dessler is a prominent climate activist, with a bad habit of smearing skeptical scientists.

    Elsner is the guy who promoted the thoroughly-debunked claim that American tornado strength has been increasing.

    McCarthy has written, in defiance of all evidence, that “the planet is in huge trouble” from climate change.

    Emmanuel Vincent is a climate activist who has launched a web site dedicated to attacking climate skeptics with misinformation.

    Of the eight scientists listed, the only one who appears to be doing more serious science than alarmist activism is Louisa Bradtmiller.

  3. Polities annexed science, which is corrupt and must listen to the politicians, who want to impose their power above the power of nature. The fact that politicians and corrupt scientists, want to convince the civilization that CO2 is the main culprit of climate change, there is a complete deception and nature and the laws of nature and its power. It is good to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, to cleaner atmosphere, but an increase in consumption of natural gas, bringing profits to politicians, and science is not able to assess the consequences cause “Caverns” from which will be drawn out natural gas?
    Climate change is occurring on all planets due to mutual influence of the planets and the sun, but in a way that science does not know and does not want to understand. Time will tell. Around 44 to 46 years (one of the most important cycles) will be significant climatic changes (count from the end of the Maunder minimum), but there are many others and the strengths and weaknesses of influence. If science does not want to know, will help her future weather events,

Comments are closed.