So is the hole in much-hyped CFC-ozone depletion hypothesis.
From NOAA:
Read “Annual Antarctic ozone hole larger and formed later in 2015” at NOAA.gov.
So is the hole in much-hyped CFC-ozone depletion hypothesis.
From NOAA:
Read “Annual Antarctic ozone hole larger and formed later in 2015” at NOAA.gov.
No change in Latidudinally Weighted Mean Global Ozone 1979-2015
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2748016
The evidence does not support the Rowland-Molina theory of ozone depletion on which the Montreal Protocol is based. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2719537
re:”Ozone ‘hole’ larger than in recent years”:
NASA said to expect this 2 years ago…
https://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/new-results-from-inside-the-ozone-hole
re:”I never hear the ‘experts’ address the question of what creates the ozone in the first place.”
Then you aren’t listening…
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/ozone/2010/twentyquestions/Q2.pdf
Unusually warm now. hmmm. Not a peep from folks that make fun of global warming when theres a cold snap. Interesting.
But, but, but…unusual cold??? How can this be? Isn’t it all balmy and warm at the poles now?
I never hear the ‘experts’ address the question of what creates the ozone in the first place. That is probably because the revelation of the natural cause of the ozone’s existence would deflate the hype.
I wonder what the ozone has been like during the history of the planet, especially during magnetic reversals?