3 thoughts on “Could it be–Warmers are Toast?”

  1. You guys, you guys, you guys! LOOK: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11181470,
    “Forest needed to cover carbon footprint of icy rescue”
    From the article:
    “The expedition had pledged to plant about 800 kauri trees in Northland to cover its carbon footprint… But former Act Party leader and Herald on Sunday columnist Rodney Hide said that would have to increase to about 5000 trees to make up for the fossil fuels burned in the rescue. Expedition leader Chris Turney said more trees would be needed than earlier estimated but he was yet to work out how many.”
    *diez laffing, iz ded*

  2. These people live in a fantasy world and no amount of facts, evidence or reality will ever shake them out of their delusions of grandeur. C.S. Lewis was a very prescient man.

  3. Andrew Thomas asserts: “Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) theory has been dominant for the past three decades as absolute fact in the public mind.”
    It has not been so everywhere. In Russia, nobody gave a hoot about global warming, anthropogenic or otherwise, except for a few pompous “intellectuals” — high achievers with advanced degrees whose achievements only made sense to themselves.
    But we live in interesting times. On a parallel thread on WUWT, this bizarre article was brought up today:
    http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/31-12-2013/126523-criminal_global_warming_fraud-0/
    What I find bizarre is not the text itself, but the fact that it comes from an infamous outlet of institutionalised fraud with a distinctly Orwellian name. And in providing ample space for the critique of AGW (which in their view must be a product of the corrupt West) they also allowed a damning exposé of fraud in mainstream physics, which they no doubt consider part of their own establishment. How cool is that?
    It almost looks as if their website was hacked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from JunkScience.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading