Inside Climate News reports:
A broad array of leading climate scientists and policy specialists were also criticizing the panel for the exact opposite reason: They believe the main conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) may be too general and too conservative to convey a clear message about the grave threat of warming and to inform policies to address local climate change issues. They say that after 25 years it might be time to overhaul the organization and refocus its research priorities.
“The state of the science and the questions to be answered have changed,” said Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist with the National Center for Atmospheric Research who has worked with the IPCC since the early 1990s…
To speed up the process, experts say the number of collaborating scientists should be decreased and the comment period shortened, among other fixes. [Emphasis added]
“To speed up the process, experts say the number of collaborating scientists should be decreased and the comment period shortened, among other fixes.”
“Keep me, keep me”, said Kevin Trenberth, of NCAR, who has worked with the IPCC since the early 1990s…
“the number of collaborating scientists should be decreased”
It would appear the concensus is shrinking.
Overhaul? How many votes for keelhaul?
These are the people Hollywood keeps pumping out disaster movies for.
My idea of an overhaul here comes close to vivisection…