Reason #2: The National Journal says there are no electoral consequences to Congressional Republicans for opposing action on climate.
2. Electoral consequences. This is the biggest reason why the Republican Party, which got just 27 percent of the Hispanic vote in the 2012 presidential race, wants to do something on immigration. For energy and environment policy, these consequences have either not materialized at all or the consequences have negatively affected candidates seeking to change the status quo. To wit: In the 2010 midterm elections, when the House flipped control from Democrats to Republicans, several red-state Democrats, such as former Rep. Rick Boucher, D-Va., lost their seats in part because of their votes in favor of legislation that created a cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, which the scientific consensus agrees causes global warming. “Frankly, a lot of us believe Republicans are in the majority because of cap-and-trade,” House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., said in a recent interview with National Journal Daily.
cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, which the scientific consensus agrees causes global warming.- the welfare and SSDI collectors have a consensus agreement that FREE money from government is a great system.
Just like GRANT FUNDED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH if you pay free money you will get a consensus of approval from the group or population receiving the FREE MONEY.- We the people must do this project email it your list and copy the brochure . . give it all elected officials in your state and local offices. VIRAL VIRAL VIRAL . .
http://articlevprojecttorestoreliberty.com/article-v—group-overview-and-proposal.html