8 thoughts on “Enviro writer in meltdown after Senate gun vote; Tweets ‘F*ck Max Baucus’, Calls Mark Pryor a ‘colossal a**hole’”
I’m sure Max Baucus wanted to vote for the background check but he’s got us Montanans to face next year. His younger version, Jon Tester, did vote for it. Which is why I keep voting the other way.
Baucus was also the primary name on DemBamaCare and now he’s saying the implementation looks like a train wreck. We told him it would be back when he sponsored this stuff.
Gun control and restriction to resourses are both environmental issues, if you can’t defend yourself, then you can’t do anything while they destroy your standard of living in the name of saving the planet. I kind of wonder about the degrees these people have, as they are unable to think rationally, makes me think the places they got their “papers” from are pretty much past their prime as teaching institutions.
What a refreshing example of tolerance and inclusion. Observe the leadership of the left.
One major argument used by eco-freaks to justify their position is to claim that “our concerns are deeply felt.”
Cussing doesn’t look all that ‘deep’, though.
THIS… is one of the best indicators that the enviro-movement is nothing BUT politics. They have the same exact kind of fervor and emotion for ECO-Issues (pardon the phrase) as they do for issues TOTALLY unrelated to the environment.
If the “environment” was THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD BAR NONE… to them, then why hold gun control at the same level of emotional importance? Wouldn’t you really want LESS human beings alive and mucking the world up, if saving the environment was the focus?
So why get MAD about a failed gun control bill UNLESS… in reality they have something very important in common, for example they are BOTH deeply sought left-wing goals and either of them were to fail?
Wait… is that the choir i hear singing?!?!?!?
Might be, but try getting logic through to the conscience of a pagan audience…. not going to happen…. might as well enjoy the hymn…
Obama had more than a few words to show his displeasure as well. But the Senators were really just being pragmatic in their votes against the bill. Good on them.
I’ve always thought that a ‘potty mouth’ is nothing more than a cover-up for a lack of intelligent arguments.
These guys have so much pent-up anger. We need guns to protect ourselves against people like him.
Leave a Reply
Discover more from JunkScience.com
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
I’m sure Max Baucus wanted to vote for the background check but he’s got us Montanans to face next year. His younger version, Jon Tester, did vote for it. Which is why I keep voting the other way.
Baucus was also the primary name on DemBamaCare and now he’s saying the implementation looks like a train wreck. We told him it would be back when he sponsored this stuff.
Gun control and restriction to resourses are both environmental issues, if you can’t defend yourself, then you can’t do anything while they destroy your standard of living in the name of saving the planet. I kind of wonder about the degrees these people have, as they are unable to think rationally, makes me think the places they got their “papers” from are pretty much past their prime as teaching institutions.
What a refreshing example of tolerance and inclusion. Observe the leadership of the left.
One major argument used by eco-freaks to justify their position is to claim that “our concerns are deeply felt.”
Cussing doesn’t look all that ‘deep’, though.
THIS… is one of the best indicators that the enviro-movement is nothing BUT politics. They have the same exact kind of fervor and emotion for ECO-Issues (pardon the phrase) as they do for issues TOTALLY unrelated to the environment.
If the “environment” was THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE WORLD BAR NONE… to them, then why hold gun control at the same level of emotional importance? Wouldn’t you really want LESS human beings alive and mucking the world up, if saving the environment was the focus?
So why get MAD about a failed gun control bill UNLESS… in reality they have something very important in common, for example they are BOTH deeply sought left-wing goals and either of them were to fail?
Wait… is that the choir i hear singing?!?!?!?
Might be, but try getting logic through to the conscience of a pagan audience…. not going to happen…. might as well enjoy the hymn…
Obama had more than a few words to show his displeasure as well. But the Senators were really just being pragmatic in their votes against the bill. Good on them.
I’ve always thought that a ‘potty mouth’ is nothing more than a cover-up for a lack of intelligent arguments.
These guys have so much pent-up anger. We need guns to protect ourselves against people like him.