5 thoughts on “WUWT: ‘Word has it that Michael Mann was one of the reviewers of Marcott et al.’”

  1. It seems … “incestuous” comes to mind … to have the creator of the first hockey stick as a reviewer of a paper that seems to confirm it, all the more when the original work has come under serious question.
    But maybe that’s why I’m a sceptic.

  2. All things considered, Mann is the expert at long term temperature reconstruction. If you do not consider his work invalid, it would be silly to not ask him to review it. The problem is that both Mann and Marcott should have been laughed out of the room when they proposed their famous papers.

Comments are closed.