The Marcott Filibuster: Admission that recent pale temps not statistically robust and not representative of global temp changes

Marcott et al have posted their long-promised FAQ at RealClimate. Without providing any links to or citation of Climate Audit, they now concede…

Read more at ClimateAudit.

2 thoughts on “The Marcott Filibuster: Admission that recent pale temps not statistically robust and not representative of global temp changes”

  1. Prof Pielke jr is extremely caustic about Marcott et al and also gives a serve to Science, New Scientist, Nature and the NYT. To Revkin’s credit balance he has made corrections to his articles, but the others are still in deep do do.

    If you can’t win over someone like Pielke jr, who is a philosophical CAGW person, then you are really batting zero point zero.

  2. Pielke Jr may be a warmist, but he’s not an alarmist, and he doesn’t put up with nonsense from either side. To say batting 0.0, you’d have to have Hansen rejecting it.

Comments are closed.