The Marcott Filibuster: Admission that recent pale temps not statistically robust and not representative of global temp changes

2 thoughts on “The Marcott Filibuster: Admission that recent pale temps not statistically robust and not representative of global temp changes”

1. Pielke Jr may be a warmist, but he’s not an alarmist, and he doesn’t put up with nonsense from either side. To say batting 0.0, you’d have to have Hansen rejecting it.

2. Prof Pielke jr is extremely caustic about Marcott et al and also gives a serve to Science, New Scientist, Nature and the NYT. To Revkin’s credit balance he has made corrections to his articles, but the others are still in deep do do.

   If you can’t win over someone like Pielke jr, who is a philosophical CAGW person, then you are really batting zero point zero.