The political nature of EPA’s coal plant standards is evident in this media release from EPA — note the activist organizations praising the EPA’s proposed standards.
The release is below.
###
CONTACT:
Cathy Milbourn (News Media Only)
Milbourn.cathy@epa.gov
202-564-7849
202-564-4355
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 27, 2012
Statements on EPA’s Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants
WASHINGTON — Following a 2007 Supreme Court ruling, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today proposed the first Clean Air Act standard for carbon pollution from new power plants. EPA’s proposed standard reflects the ongoing trend in the power sector to build cleaner plants that take advantage of American-made technologies, including new, clean-burning, efficient natural gas generation, which is already the technology of choice for new and planned power plants. At the same time, the rule creates a path forward for new technologies to be deployed at future facilities that will allow companies to burn coal, while emitting less carbon pollution. The rulemaking proposed today only concerns new generating units that will be built in the future, and does not apply to existing units already operating or units that will start construction over the next 12 months. Here’s what people across the country are saying about EPA’s proposed carbon pollution standard for new power plants:
John Arensmeyer, CEO, Small Business Majority:
“…National opinion polling we released in September found 76 percent of small business owners support the EPA regulating carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act. Another 87 percent believe improving innovation and energy efficiency are good ways to increase prosperity for small businesses…”
Albert A. Rizzo, M.D., Chair, Board of Directors of the American Lung Association:
“…By proposing standards for carbon pollution from new facilities, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is setting the stage for the next generation of America’s power plants to be the least toxic and most modern in the world…”
The Clean Energy Group’s Clean Air Policy Initiative:
“…EPA’s action today represents a modest step that provides the industry with business and regulatory certainty… Further, based on our review of recent projections by the U.S. Energy Information Administration and current market dynamics, the proposed GHG performance standards for new sources will not impact the reliability of the electric system.”
Mindy S. Lubber, president of Ceres and director of the Investor Network on Climate Risk:
“Ceres applauds the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for releasing, for public comment, its historic proposal to limit carbon pollution from new power plants under the Clean Air Act. Ceres supports this new standard because it will provide certainty to businesses and investors, clarify the risks and opportunities for the U.S. electric power sector, and serve as a long-term market signal to drive greater investment in lower-carbon electric power generation…”
Dick Munson, SVP, Recycled Energy Development:
“The Environmental Protection Agency’s new rules on greenhouse-gas emissions will help U.S. businesses increase their productivity and competitiveness. By internalizing the costs of pollution, EPA has provided certainty to firms seeking to generate clean energy and increase manufacturing efficiency.”
Ralph Izzo, CEO, Public Service Electric and Gas:
“…The Agency’s action establishes a logical and modest standard for new electric power plants and provides the industry with much-needed regulatory certainty. The EPA provides a framework for the industry to confront this problem in a cost effective manner…”
Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety:
“…Today’s proposal to ensure that new coal and natural gas power plants take into account their greenhouse gas emissions before they commence construction is a step in the right direction as we work to curb these harmful emissions…”
Bill Ritter Jr., Former Colorado Governor:
“…It is welcome news, indeed, to see our nation moving forward with clean air standards to limit the harmful carbon pollution from new coal burning power plants as coal plants are the highest emitting source of air pollution in our country. The proposed emission standards for carbon pollution will unleash smart investments in cleaner, homegrown energy that will limit dangerous pollution and build a modern clean energy economy for the 21st Century.”
Senator Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.):
“The EPA took an important step today in the effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with the release of the New Source Performance Standards…”
Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D- Calif.), Ranking Member, Committee on Energy and Commerce:
“The proposal is a breakthrough. It sets achievable limits on dangerous carbon pollution, spurs investments in new clean energy technologies, and provides certainty for industry. And it shows the President is listening to scientists, not extremists who deny the existence of climate change. Today’s action will reduce pollution, make families healthier, promote innovation, and help us compete with China and other countries that are investing in clean energy.”
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Ranking Member, Committee on Natural Resources:
“…The Obama administration has already put us on the path towards emitting less pollution from our vehicle tailpipes, and now they are doing the same thing for America’s power plant smokestacks. Both efforts will spur a generation of American-built energy innovation, and help stave off the worse effects of climate change. This carbon standard is yet another indication that we need to keep America’s natural gas here at home to provide affordable electricity and capitalize on this competitive advantage to rebuild our manufacturing, chemical and fertilizer industries.”
American Sustainable Business Council, Environmental Entrepreneurs (E2) and Main Street Alliance:
“…As representatives of the business community, we understand the importance of certainty and clear market signals and believe a national standard to reduce carbon pollution from new power plants will both clarify risks and opportunities for U.S. businesses, while also leading to technological innovation and investment in the domestic clean energy market. Investing in cleaner technologies and more efficient resources can be a pathway to profit and prosperity, boosting economic growth and creating jobs while also providing competitive returns to investors. We look forward to reviewing the proposal and identifying opportunities for increased investment in innovative low and no-carbon technologies as well as new energy infrastructure and energy efficiency…”
R046
Not nearly as well. Combined cycle has a significant lag time. Single-cycle plants are typically used for load-following.
CO2
What are these people smoking, cause I want some.
Not a single unbiased reviewer in the lot. 1960s Pravda would be proud. Time to castrate the EPA.
Gee, they didn’t include what Sen. Joe Manchin
says.
The standard allows one pound of carbon dioxide maximum per kilowatt-hr electricity produced. No coal plant can meet that standard. Natural gas fired-plants will have to use a combined cycle(burn your gas to run a gas turbine and take the turbine exhaust and use it to make steam to run a steam turbine). The plant efficiency has to be 47 percent or higher converting the energy in the natural gas into kw-hrs. This can be done and is being done today.
A question I have is how well do combined cycles follow the load patterns(up and down) of solar and wind power plants that we are being forced to use by governments mandating their use in spite of them being uneconomical and impractical. This may be an unintended consequence that can bring the whole house of cards down and we will go back to 1870 with no electricity.
Outrageous ruling by the EPA. The people need to react vigorously to protect their interests. Write your Congress members and demand they strike all funding for the EPA.