NYTimes: EU airline emissions plan is A-OK

Elitism: So what if it costs a little money to “begin to address global warming?”

In “Airlines, Emissions and Europe’s Sensible Plan,” the New York Times editorializes:

The carbon dioxide from airplanes accounts for about 3 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, a share projected to go up as air traffic rises. The European Union is now requiring airlines that fly into or out of Europe to pay a fee for these emissions. This is a smart response to an urgent problem. The United States and the other nations opposing the program should either come up with a better idea — soon — or drop their objections.

Under the scheme, essentially a cap-and-trade system, airlines will be given an emissions ceiling and allocated permits. They will have to buy new permits only if they exceed the ceiling. This will put a premium on operating more efficiently. And Europe’s hope is that it will avert any increase in emissions and lead to a modest drop, beginning with a 3 percent cut this year compared with a 2004-6 baseline.

The United States, Russia, China and 20 other nations opposed to the plan met in Moscow last week to plot a response. Though no specific actions were agreed, there was much belligerent talk, and even a list of possible retaliatory actions, including levies on European-based airlines that fly internationally. Russia suggested that it might withdraw permissions for European airlines to fly over Siberia on routes from Europe to Asia.

For the sake of their own financial survival, many airlines are trying to become more efficient. But like the power industries, many of which have vociferously resisted cap and trade, they want to change on their own schedule, and without the threat of penalties.

Governments are clearly listening to their airlines. Many, notably Russia and China, also bristle at what they see as an insult to their sovereignty. The Obama administration says it would prefer a global agreement under United Nations auspices. That would be great. But Europe argues, with some justification, that talks aimed at such an agreement have been going on fruitlessly for 15 years, while the problem of climate change continues to grow.

It is not yet clear how many airlines, if any, will exceed their allotment, and by how much. Some of them have already added small surcharges — $3 in the case of Delta Air Lines — in anticipation of having to pay something when the E.U. presents the bill.

The cost estimates are all over the lot. The E.U. expects a first-year increase of $2.60 in the price of a ticket between Europe and China. The International Air Transport Association says increases could be in the $20 to $45 range. Either way, passengers are not looking at charges much greater than what it now costs to check a single bag. This seems a small price to pay for encouraging more efficient airlines and beginning to address global warming.

4 thoughts on “NYTimes: EU airline emissions plan is A-OK”

  1. Hit the NY Times people where it hurts; start taxing imported foods that use fermentation (giving off carbon dioxide) such as wine, beer, bread and cheese.

  2. It’s fine to soak the unwashed masses, just implement an exemption for the elite like the NY Times folks.

  3. Unbelievable that the New York Times should so meekly accept that a foreign power can and should unilaterally impose sanctions on its airlines.

    The US and the Australian Governments and their media apparatchiks seem to be losing their cojones. Luckily, the people are not. Let us hope they remember to express their views the next time an election rolls around………

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.