LCV Scorecard: ‘Most anti-environmental session of House in history’

Speaking on behalf of the anti-enviromentalist movement, we are on the ascendancy.

The League of Conservation Voters release for its”>annual scorecard is below.


Contact: Kate Geller, (202) 785-8683 or

07 Feb 2012 | Mike Palamuso
***Full Scorecard Available at ***

WASHINGTON – The League of Conservations Voters (LCV), which works to turn environmental values into national priorities, today released the 2011 National Environmental Scorecard. The 2011 Scorecard reflects the most anti-environmental session of the U.S. House of Representatives in history, featuring unparalleled assaults on our nation’s bedrock environmental and public health safeguards.

“The 2011 National Environmental Scorecard is a sad testament to the radical nature of the U.S. House of Representatives in the first session of the 112th Congress,” said Tiernan Sittenfeld, LCV Senior Vice President of Government Affairs. “We applaud those members who opposed the multitude of attacks on vital public health and environmental protections in 2011. However, it’s deeply disappointing that so many members chose to put corporate polluters and other special interests ahead of the health and well-being of their constituents.”

The 2011 Scorecard includes 11 Senate and a record 35 House votes on issues ranging from public health protections to clean energy to land and wildlife conservation. The House votes included in the 2011 Scorecard are simply many of the most significant votes taken in a year that saw the House voting more than 200 times on the environment and public health.

This year, 31 senators earned a perfect 100% score, while in the House 24 members earned a perfect 100% score. In the Senate, 13 senators earned an appalling 0% score, while in the House 4 members earned a 0% score. A major indicator of the change in landscape in the House for 2011 is the fact that the average lifetime score of members defeated in the 2010 election cycle was 73% while the average 2011 score of the House members who replaced them is 15%.

“In 2011, the House Republican leadership unleashed a truly breathtaking and unprecedented assault on the environment and public health, the breadth and depth of which have made the current U.S. House of Representatives the most anti-environmental in our nation’s history,” said LCV President Gene Karpinski. “LCV is grateful to the Obama administration, allies in the Senate and House, and the millions of people across the country who helped to ensure that the House leadership did not succeed in gutting our nation’s cornerstone environmental and public health protections in 2011.”

While the House voted against the environment a shocking number of times, both the U.S. Senate and the Obama administration stood fast against the vast majority of these attacks. Indeed, not only did our cornerstone environmental protections emerge from 2011 largely unscathed, the Obama administration also made major progress through administrative actions to protect our air and water.

For over 40 years, the National Environmental Scorecard issued by LCV has been the nationally accepted yardstick used to rate members of Congress on environmental, public health and energy issues.

The full 2011 National Environmental Scorecard can be found at

3 thoughts on “LCV Scorecard: ‘Most anti-environmental session of House in history’”

  1. True conservation would include recycling spent nuclear fuel material to recover the plutonium and useful uranium for use in new fuel cells. Appropriate standards and practices could keep the nuclear materials out of bombs in the same way “new” uranium for fuel are kept out of bombs. The useful fuel content in waste fuel greatly exceeds the fuel content of uranium ore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.