Michael Mann colleague Donald Brown says it is unethical to differ from “consensus-approved” IPCC conclusions.
From Penn State climate “ethicist” Donald Brown:
… However, a review of the tactics used by the scientific disinformation campaign will reveal that these tactics can’t be construed as the application of reasonable scientific skepticism, but, as we shall see, often constitute malicious, morally reprehensible disinformation…
Yet, as we shall see, much of the ideological climate disinformation that has been prominent in the climate change debate in the United States and a few other developed countries is deeply
ethically abhorrent…
Yeesh. This guy is a professor? He’s condemning skeptics like conspiracy theorists!
His comments are the classic example of what he is condeming.
Is this guy talking to himself in the mirror – his arrogance is beyond belief!
Sounds like the grants to study APG are drying up!
This from a University that turned a blind eye to Sandusky’s “morally reprehensible” behavior…consider the source…