FACT SHEET: EPA’s Claim That Its Coal Plant CO2 Rules Will Save Lives By Reducing Particulate Matter Emissions Is False
Originally posted on Tallbloke's Talkshop:
My thanks to Patrick Moore, co-founder and ex Greenpeace leader, and since 1986 ‘the sensible environmentalist’, for his permission to repost this article printed in the Australian recently. The name of Patrick’s own venture - Ecosense reflects his logical and humanist approach to the climate debate.
Patrick Moore: We Need More Carbon Dioxide, Not Less
Australian politics has been more influenced by the climate debate than any other country. Yet Australia is responsible for only 1.5 per cent of global CO2 emissions. Perhaps this speaks of Australia’s extraordinary commitment to the international community. Yet Australia has threatened to hobble its own economy while much larger nations take a pass while making pious pronouncements.
I am sceptical that humans are the main cause of climate change, and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told “the debate is over”…
View original 939 more words
EPA’s proposed ground level ozone standards are a combination of arrogance, lack of science and wishful thinking. Continue reading
Mary Kay Barton writes about the wind scammers.
George Neumayr writes about things from a religious point of view–so he can’t help but give a moral coloring to the Ferguson race riot debacle.
I have been taking multiple choice tests all my life, and I am pretty good at it.
Colin Flaherty started covering black on white street violence and flash mob, knock out game stuff more than a year ago. He was struck by the refusal of the MSM to cover. Racialism is the reason.