John Christy, Boss of the Weather and Satellite studies program at Huntsville, says it’s not that good.
We thought Christy, Richard Lindzen (MIT Climate expert) and Judith Curry (Georgia Tech Climate expert), all critical of warming modeling and assertions, were going to be on the climate science review panel for the American Physical Society, but NOOOOOO. They are going to be allowed to present.
That means the whole panel will be warmers, and they will be pressured by a Board that is warmers.
I have no information from anyone that the APS has any warming skeptics anywhere near a position influence the outcome.
Assume that more than 20 billion spent to promote warming ideas by the US Government every year is being spent to fund those in the APS who do climate type research, or to fund those who do it who are colleagues of the APS people.
Do we call that a rigged game? Why yes we do.