My latest at RealClearMarkets.com.

I was just on Newsmax’s “American Agenda” talking the Great Texas Windmill Disaster with Heather Childers and Bob Sellers. My related op-ed is here. The windmills failed first and most. The rest is just spin to make up for the windmills that didn’t.
The linear non-threshold model (LNT) for carcinogenesis sadly is the foundation chemical and radiation risk assessment around the world. Here, the University of Massachusetts-Amherst’s Dr. Ed Calabrese explains the historical scientific fraud that underpins the LNT. Calabrese has done amazing original investigative research that has been previously published in numerous articles in various scientific journals. In this 55-minute video, he boils it all down. Don’t pass it up. We owe Ed a great debt for this difficult and thankless research.
Read the fabulous Ben Zycher‘s even more fabulous House testimony on the ongoing climate communist bid to convert corporate America into useful idiots via ESG (Environmental Social and Governance), which used to be called CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility).

As of March 4, 2021, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is looking for tips on false and misleading climate disclosures. We welcome this since we petitioned the SEC in August 2019 to take action against climate lying. Here is today’s example (and tip for the SEC) of climate lying from Delta Airlines.

I petitioned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in August 2019 to take action against climate lying. Now, the SEC has set up a task force inside the Division of Enforcement, the part of the Commission that sends people to jail. I wonder if we’re on the same page? We shall see. The SEC media release is below.

Continue reading SEC announces Climate Task Force to punish climate lying
“To date, regulatory agencies appear to have ignored these scientific developments and have seemingly doubled down on their assertions to support LNT, holding to a belief without a credible history and scientific foundation.” Low Rad Journal-LNTHere is the paper.
“For decades, climate change researchers and activists have used dramatic forecasts to attempt to influence public perception of the problem and as a call to action on climate change. These forecasts have frequently been for events that might be called ‘apocalyptic,’ because they predict cataclysmic events resulting from climate change. In a new paper published in the International Journal of Global Warming, Carnegie Mellon University’s David Rode and Paul Fischbeck argue that making such forecasts can be counterproductive.”

Continue reading Study: Climate bedwetters decry ‘extreme climate forecasts’
From the February 17 edition of “Prime Time.”
From today’s edition of Newsmax’s “National Report.”