Shock: Biden, Kerry change climate science narrative at COP26; Claim methane responsible for about half of observed warming

Joe Biden and John Kerry entirely changed the climate science narrative today by claiming that methane is responsible for about half of the 1.1C warming observed since industrialization. This means that the new science narrative is that recent methane emissions have had about as much of a warming effect as all the CO2 emissions from all the coal, oil and gas ever burned. Here’s the video clip of their statements. Support JunkScience.com!

Support JunkScience.com!

EU climate idiocy eviscerated by Czech PM Andrej Babiš

At COP-26 today, the Czech PM Andrej Babiš completely dismantles EU climate idiocy, including its “Green Deal” and “Fit for 55” climate package. An awesome watch. Please support JunkScience.com. You wouldn’t even hear this mentioned anywhere else.

Please support JunkScience.com.

Former CASAC chair added as plaintiff in Young v. EPA

Tony Cox, the former chairman of the EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, has been added as a plaintiff to the Young v. EPA suit about EPA’s illegal stacking of agency science advisory boards with grant-recipient cronies. The amended complaint is here. Here is media coverage of the lawsuit: Washington Times | Legal Insurrection | Daily Signal | Report Door | Epoch Times | Reuters | Law360 | National Review | Daily Caller | Bloomberg Law | Fox News

Preliminary injunction sought in Young v. EPA

Just filed, here is the memorandum in support of a preliminary injunction against EPA in Young v. EPA. Dr. Young has asked the court to step in immediately and to block EPA from starting the CASAC advisory process until the CASAC can be reconstituted in the balanced manner required by the law. Dr. Young and other highly qualified scientists were purposefully and unlawfully excluded from CASAC so that EPA’s panel of hand-picked grant recipient cronies could rubberstamp, in an expedited manner, the agency’s predetermined regulatory agenda with respect to fine particulate matter in outdoor air called “PM2.5.” EPA has clearly violated the intent and letter of the law. If allowed to proceed with its corrupt panel, EPA and the public will be deprived of Dr. Young’s expert, independent and unbiased views. Given the significance of PM2.5 science to EPA PM2.5 regulations, which have been the basis of EPA’s most consequential and costly air quality and climate regulations, it is incumbent up EPA to base regulatory decisions on the best available science vs. the corrupt process in place now. Here is my op-ed about the case in today’s Washington Times.

Support JunkScience.com!