Rep. G.K. Butterfield says that Waxman-Markey “literally will save the planet.”
Phew…
Rep. G.K. Butterfield says that Waxman-Markey “literally will save the planet.”
Phew…
Rep. Thadeus McCotter (R-MI) declaimed Waxman-Markey as “nuts on its face.”
Carbon Control News reports at 1:35pm ET that
… the majority currently lacks the votes to pass the landmark cap-and-trade proposal.
But Politico reports that
Dems smell victory…
Stay tuned…
A Texas congressman said that W-M is no more than a photo-op for Obama in Copenhagen while the Chinese and Indians laugh behind our back.
Rep. John Dingell (D-General Motors) said that the endorsement of Waxman-Markey by USCAP (i.e., our eco-industrial Big Brother) proves the bill is worthy. Dingell also threatened EPA regulation.
Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY) urged support for Waxman-Markey on the hope that it can be improved after it is enacted…
Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA) said that if Congress didn’t vote for Waxman-Markey, EPA would regulate CO2 under the Clean Air Act — i.e., with little consideration for economics.
How about a third option — no CO2 regulation at all?
… because, as reported in Carbon Control News this morning:
… they trust that their allies in Congress, including Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) who co-sponsored by the bill, and the White House will develop and implement the package in a way that is environmentally protective.
Any CEO that think he’s cut a deal on climate is in for a big surprise…
… so reports Politico.com.
Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) said that Waxman-Markey would “unleash the brilliance” of our scientists and engineers. Has there been a law against such brilliance up until now?
Rep. Mike Pence says that the Waxman-Markey bill, as amended at 3am, may contain new trade restrictions, but he can’t tell because of the rush to bring the bill to the House floor.
Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) said to today that regulating “carbon pollution” would make the future “less uncertain”…