Climate models don’t work because they don’t omit or misunderstand major factors that influence global temperature. One of these is aerosols. Hence the new paper reported here. What’s notable though is the quote from one of the study authors explaining the problem with climate models. It’s not that they’re wrong…
An academic has published a paper which uses mathematical models to show that it would be feasible for Germany to wean itself from Russian coal, oil and gas. This story is not about that paper. Rather, it’s about Germany Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s curious response.
Continue reading German Chancellor decries “mathematical models that don’t work”
My latest in the Washington Examiner (Web | PDF)
Continue reading A Securities and Environment Commission invents itself
From the March 23 episode of Tipping Point.
Here is the statement (Web | PDF) of SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce from today’s SEC meeting (by Zoom) announcing its proposed climate disclosure rule. Poking fun at SEC climate idiocy, Commissioner Peirce noted she was turning of her video, saying: “My statement is rather lengthy, so I will turn my video off as I speak; by one estimate, doing so will reduce the carbon footprint of my presentation on this platform by 96 percent.”
Glad to see this in the news today. Click for FOXNews coverage | CNS News coverage | 2017 House GOP letter to Treasury Secretary Mnuchin
Two segments from the March 7, 2022 episode.
From a February 23 BBC interview: “I hope President Putin will help us with respect to what we need to do to stay on track with the climate.” Unbelievable. Video clip below.
Check out this clip from the late-Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), a co-author of the Clean Air Act. The authors of the law thought it was “clear enough” that EPA was “NOT” authorized to regulate greenhouse gases and that only a “stupid” Supreme Court would hold otherwise. Under our system of government, the legislative branch writes the laws for the executive branch to implement and the role of the judicial branch is to clean up controversies. But in its 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, the Supreme Court ignored Congress to invent regulatory authority for EPA. On Feb. 28, the Court will hear argument in West Virgina v. EPA that may repair, as Rep. Dingell said, its “very much erroneous decision.”
BTW, you are able to watch this important video because JunkScience.com happened to be watching this hearing on Jan. 28. 2014. No one else has this clip. So please support JunkScience.com!
From the February 15, 2022 episode of Fox News Ingraham Angle.
