My latest in the Washington Examiner.
Author: Steve Milloy
Milloy talks climate, dinosaurs, population control with Kara McKinney on OANN
From the October 29, 2021 edition of Tipping Point.
Former CASAC chair added as plaintiff in Young v. EPA
Tony Cox, the former chairman of the EPA’s Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, has been added as a plaintiff to the Young v. EPA suit about EPA’s illegal stacking of agency science advisory boards with grant-recipient cronies. The amended complaint is here. Here is media coverage of the lawsuit: Washington Times | Legal Insurrection | Daily Signal | Report Door | Epoch Times | Reuters | Law360 | National Review | Daily Caller | Bloomberg Law | Fox News
Oh my… ‘pregnant people’ are underrepresented in nutrition research!
Bill Gate must be very proud of funding this “research.”
Continue reading Oh my… ‘pregnant people’ are underrepresented in nutrition research!
Preliminary injunction sought in Young v. EPA
Just filed, here is the memorandum in support of a preliminary injunction against EPA in Young v. EPA. Dr. Young has asked the court to step in immediately and to block EPA from starting the CASAC advisory process until the CASAC can be reconstituted in the balanced manner required by the law. Dr. Young and other highly qualified scientists were purposefully and unlawfully excluded from CASAC so that EPA’s panel of hand-picked grant recipient cronies could rubberstamp, in an expedited manner, the agency’s predetermined regulatory agenda with respect to fine particulate matter in outdoor air called “PM2.5.” EPA has clearly violated the intent and letter of the law. If allowed to proceed with its corrupt panel, EPA and the public will be deprived of Dr. Young’s expert, independent and unbiased views. Given the significance of PM2.5 science to EPA PM2.5 regulations, which have been the basis of EPA’s most consequential and costly air quality and climate regulations, it is incumbent up EPA to base regulatory decisions on the best available science vs. the corrupt process in place now. Here is my op-ed about the case in today’s Washington Times.
Derailing the EPA Climate Railroad
JunkScience.com drives climate communists crazy
My new business card, courtesy of the George Soros-funded Media Matters. This is why you should support JunkScience.com. Nobody does it like I do.
Milloy talks EPA lawsuit, Google demonetization, & energy crisis with OANN’s Kara McKinney
From the October 8, 2021 episode of OANN’s Tipping Point.
The EPA PM railroad begins rolling
After science advisor cleansing and reconstituting science advisory boards with its rubber-stamping cronies, the EPA PM2.5 railroad is ready to roll. It has an ‘updated assessment’ out and ready for rubberstamping, starting with EPA’s CASAC PM subpanel of cronies. The ostensible goal is to cut the PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) from 12 millionths of a gram per cubic meter to 8. What stands in the way of all this fraud is Young v. EPA.
JunkScience statement on Google demonetization of climate realist sites
Google’s announced demonetization of web sites that expose the climate hoax does nothing but validate what climate realists have been saying for years: It’s not about the climate; it’s about the political power. If what we were saying was wrong, we would have been laughed off the Internet long ago. Instead, reality is validating us and public support for climate idiocy is going nowhere. Just this morning, the New York Times reported that climate even polls badly among Democrats — an issue for “weird, very white liberal people.” Google’s move will have no effect on climate realist web sites for the simple reason that the ad revenue is pretty trivial. We don’t know of any climate realist who blogs for the Google ad revenue. We do it, because we oppose the abuse of science, especially as it is being used to advance totalitarianism. Google’s demonetization is an admission that we are winning, a treasure far more valuable than Google ad revenue. Winning… with or without a few shekels from Google.
Don’t miss Media Research Center/Newsbusters coverage of this story.
Young v. EPA makes top of FOX News
Biden EPA sued for illegally stacking science advisory panels
Young v. EPA is a hugely important lawsuit. The law requires that EPA seek scientific advice from an independent and balanced panel of qualified scientists as part of its policy-making process. The Biden EPA has turned the law on its head by first deciding what its policy is and then stacking the panel with its cronies. These EPA cronies are academic researchers who have been awarded tens of millions of dollars’ worth of EPA grants. This will not be independent and balanced scientific review; rather it will be the rubberstamping of EPA’s predetermined policy in contravention of congressional intent. Dr. Stan Young and other applicants were rejected by EPA from panel membership not because they are unqualified, but because they have points of view that might jeopardize EPA’s pre-determined policy plans. The EPA policies at stake rely on of the agency’s most potent regulatory powers and will have major economic and social ramifications for America. The notion that these policies will not get the independent and balanced review Congress intended for them to have is simply outrageous. A copy of the complaint is here.
