Milloy to Extinction Rebellion zombie talking over me: “Dude, shut up, it’s my turn.”
Month: May 2023
USA Today ‘fact-checks’ Milloy tweet as correct
But USA Today can’t do emissions math and misses the point.
Continue reading USA Today ‘fact-checks’ Milloy tweet as correct
Asked about radiation causing genetic mutation, ChatGPT responded with fictional studies
A new low for artificial intelligence — ChatGPT cited admittedly “fictional” scientific studies to answer a question about radiation.
EPA’s CCS requirement is illegal; The agency blocked its Science Advisory Board from saying so 10 years ago
EPA proposed today that utilities stop burning coal and natural gas by 2040 unless power plants can be outfitted with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. The agency tried mandating CCS 10 years ago, but its Science Advisory Board got in the way. So EPA killed SAB review of CCS.
Climate Fact Check: April 2023 Edition
Ten pieces of climate propaganda from April 2023 exposed and debunked. The full PDF version (needed to click through to the links) is here.
No, radiation doesn’t cause gene mutations
The illustration below is from the December 1953 issue of Mechanix Illustrated. So where did people get the still-never-demonstrated idea that radiation could cause genetic mutations, if not mutant beings? You can trace it all back radiation-scare fraudster Herman Muller and his bogus 1927 paper in Science magazine, “Artificial Transmutation of the Gene,” which led to Muller’s (undeserved) 1946 Nobel Prize.
Mother of all cancer risk assessment regulation found to be science fraud
Climate junk scientist James Hansen wasn’t the first to use the term “loaded dice” in regard to alleged human enhancement of environmental risk. That “honor” goes to Science magazine which use the term in its editorial heralding its May 1957 publication of the foundational paper of all cancer risk assessment, E.B. Lewis’ “Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation.”
Continue reading Mother of all cancer risk assessment regulation found to be science fraud
Sen. John Kennedy: “Now, I’m all for carbon neutrality”
How does a politician from an oil & gas producing state get away with this?
1956 National Academy of Sciences report on radiation risk discovered to be science fraud
The article highlighted on the June 13, 1956 front-page of the New York Times was the product of demonstrable science fraud committed by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS). The subject report by the NAS is a foundational document for the junk science that is the linear no-threshold model used in regulatory risk assessment. If you want the story on the NAS report, watch Episode 12, Episode 13 and Episode 14 of the Health Physics Society’s video series entitled, “The Historical Foundations of the Linear No-Threshold Dose-Response Model for Cancer Risk Assessment.” This is a mere teaser for LNT news to be broken on this page that will rock the radiation safety and regulatory risk assessment bureaucracy. So get informed and stay tuned. It’s recommended that you watch the entire 22-part HPS video series ASAP so you can better appreciate the news when it breaks.
Milloy forces ExxonMobil to admit for the first time that more CO2 is produced than stored during enhanced oil recovery
I love oil companies. But I hate lying. Especially climate lying.
Oil companies have for years been telling the public that they are reducing CO2 emissions by storing CO2 underground when they inject it into wells to produce hard-to-reach oil. This process is called “enhanced oil recovery” or EOR. I showed the claim was false years ago. But no company would admit it.
