I have hit nerve with Big Climate. So I must be destroyed. Almost every wire service has fake-factchecked me in the past month following my blockbuster exposure of the emissions hoax. Here is the pathetic attempt by Agence France Presse (AFP).
Here is the AFP’s fake fact-check (Web | PDF).
Here are the earlier fake factchecks: Reuters; Twitter; Associated Press; Australian Associated Press and FactCheck.org.
AFP was roused to action by this tweet:
Or as AFP distorts (literally), fades and draws a big “X” through my tweet:
So AFP — as with the other wire services albeit on a different tweet, accuses me of cherry-picking a single month.
No.
I picked the last month for which we have full data, i.e., January 2023.
And as it turns out, despite 50 percent of total manmade CO2, January 2023 was cooler than January 1988 by 0.04°C. (Note: My tweet erroneously shows January 1987, which BTW was only 0.02°C cooler than January 2023. An inadvertent mistake. But makes no real difference since we are talking about unmeasurable changes in estimated temperature.) Here are the NASA satellite data.
Keep in mind we are told that every emission makes the planet warmer and that emissions drive the observed warming.
If so, how does one explain the absence of warming after a doubling of manmade emissions? Does AFP or anyone have an answer for that? Here is my hypothesis.
Emissions-driven climate is a hoax. I know it. You know it. And they know it.
That’s why every wire service is fake fact-checking me hoping to get Elon Musk to kick me off Twitter and shut me up.